Taekwang Industrial earns money from two businesses: petrochemicals (propylene-based and commodity products, about three-quarters of revenue) and textiles such as spandex and aramid. A supply glut from China has pushed petrochemicals into the red, but aramid, an ultra-high-strength fiber for defense and cable reinforcement, is a future growth axis. In March 2026 it completed the acquisition of Aekyung Industrial, a cosmetics and household-goods company, broadening into consumer products, and in May it made a voluntary disclosure of a new facility investment for aramid expansion. What stands out lately is that a hefty net-cash position and net assets more than four times the market cap make the undervaluation signal clear on an asset-value basis; on the other hand, petrochemical commodity products need China's supply glut to ease before margins return, and with net profit leaning heavily on non-operating financial gains, the recovery of core-business margins and the realization of asset value are the points to watch.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthStable
  • Debt ratio, current ratio and interest burden all look healthy.
GrowthDeclining
  • Revenue fell 9.9% year over year (3-year trend: falling).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 9.3% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityModerate
  • ROE is 2.1% (controlling-interest basis). It is below the sector average.
  • Operating margin is -2.0%.
ValuationUndervalued
  • P/B is low versus peers too, so it looks cheap on an asset basis as well.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Lee Ho-jin 29.48% (individual)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 54.53%

With the controlling bloc holding 55%, control is very secure but the free float is thin.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Taekwang Industrial earns money from two broad businesses.
  • The first is petrochemicals, which account for about three-quarters of revenue.
  • It makes and sells propylene-based and commodity chemical products, and with prices depressed by a supply glut from China, this segment is the main culprit behind recent losses.
  • The second is textiles, in the 10-percent range of revenue.
  • Alongside spandex, this includes aramid, an ultra-high-strength fiber for ballistic and industrial use.
  • Aramid is an item growing on demand for defense and cable reinforcement, making it the company's future growth axis.
  • On top of that, in March 2026 it acquired Aekyung Industrial, a cosmetics and household-goods company, broadening into consumer products (B2C).
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩806,000 and the market cap is ₩897.4 billion.
  • The price sits below its 20-day line (₩862,050) and below its 60-day line (₩1,009,567).
  • Trading beneath both its short- and mid-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (a supplementary gauge comparing upward and downward strength over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 37.8, a neutral level.
  • The one-month change is -10.9%, the three-month change is -27.8%, and the position versus the 52-week high is -48.7%.
  • Relative strength against the KOSPI is 31 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns versus the index over the past year with heavier weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it in roughly the top 69% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it lagged the index by 45.2%.
  • Chart readings are best viewed alongside trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • The most striking thing is that the P/B (how many times book net assets the share price is) is 0.24.
  • That means it trades at a quarter of its net assets, so the share price is very cheap against assets.
  • The finances are sturdy.
  • The debt ratio (debt relative to equity) is low at 13.6%, and net debt is negative.
  • In other words, it is a net-cash company with roughly ₩417.3 billion more cash than debt.
  • That net cash alone exceeds 40% of the market cap.
  • Profitability splits along different lines.
  • Core operating profit is a ₩36.0 billion loss (operating margin of -2.0%).
  • Yet net profit is a ₩80.8 billion surplus.
  • That is because equity and investment gains from financial affiliates such as Heungkuk Life and Heungkuk Fire add roughly ₩100 billion a year from outside operations.
  • As a result, measuring this company by the P/E (how many times a year's earnings the share price is) alone distorts the picture.
🚀Growth
  • The revenue trend is depressed.
  • 2025 revenue was ₩1.8274 trillion, down 9.9% from the prior year, a third straight year of decline.
  • This owed to weak petrochemical commodity prices.
  • That said, first-quarter 2026 revenue turned direction, rising 9.3% year over year to ₩533.3 billion.
  • The growth drivers are clear.
  • An expansion of the Ulsan para-aramid plant from 1,500 tons to about 5,500 tons a year — roughly a fourfold increase — began operating in March 2026 (investment of about ₩145.0 billion).
  • It targets production of 2,600 tons this year and ramps up in stages to peak operation in 2028.
  • On top of that, Aekyung Industrial was folded into consolidation in March 2026, newly adding consumer-product revenue.
  • The company has officially set a 2030 ROE (return on equity, how much is earned in a year per unit of equity) target of 8%.
  • This year's earnings are expected to be driven more by financial-affiliate gains and the effect of consolidating the new business than by the weak core operations; on a forward basis, today's low net-profit multiple, together with asset value, supports the undervaluation.
📰Recent news & filings
  • Recent disclosures tie together into a single thread of business restructuring.
  • In March 2026 it completed the acquisition of Aekyung Industrial, newly establishing a consumer-product axis in cosmetics and household goods.
  • In May it made a voluntary disclosure of a new facility investment related to aramid expansion, a decision that lifts its ultra-high-strength fiber capacity toward the top tier domestically.
  • In the same May it disclosed the holding of an investor briefing (IR).
  • In June a clarification disclosure regarding rumor or media reports was issued.
  • Large-business-group status disclosures are also filed periodically.
🧭Bottom line
  • The strengths are assets and finances.
  • Net cash is hefty, and net assets are more than four times the market cap.
  • Even with the core business in the red, financial-affiliate gains keep net profit in surplus.
  • Added to that are the growth axes of aramid expansion and the Aekyung acquisition.
  • This stock shows a clear undervaluation signal when viewed by asset value rather than the P/E.
  • The caution is the timing of the core business's recovery.
  • Petrochemical commodity products need China's supply glut to ease before margins return.
  • With net profit leaning heavily on non-operating financial gains, if those gains wobble the multiple could swing too.
  • The policy of using treasury shares (24.4%) as a funding source for the acquisition rather than cancelling them divides views on the strength of shareholder returns.
  • In sum, the assets, cash, and growth ingredients are strong, and the recovery of core-business margins and the actual realization of asset value are the points to watch.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Undervalued

Large domestic chemical/petrochemical companies with similar business overlap and asset/financial character are taken as the peer set.

PeerP/EP/BROE
Lotte Chemical0.00x0.21x-16.19%
LG Chem0.00x0.55x-5.54%
SK Chemicals15.81x0.31x1.98%

Large petrochemical companies all trade below net assets amid China's supply glut. Lotte Chemical has a P/B of 0.22, and LG Chem too is in a net loss, with the whole industry cycle depressed. Taekwang Industrial's differentiators are two. First, its net cash and net assets are overwhelming. Net cash alone exceeds 40% of the market cap, and net assets are more than four times the market cap. Second, even with the core business in the red, financial-affiliate gains keep net profit in surplus. This company should not be viewed by the earnings multiple (P/E) alone, because net profit is driven by non-operating gains, making the multiple erratic. Viewed by asset value held (net cash + affiliate stakes + operating value), the market cap falls well short of that sum, which reads as undervalued. Last year's P/E of 11.9 is neither low nor especially high, but since the crux of this stock is the asset discount, it is judged undervalued.

₩806,000 -3.01%
Market cap $594.8M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩806,000 and the market capitalization is ₩897.4 billion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩862,050) and below its 60-day moving average (₩1,009,567). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 37.8, a neutral level. The one-month change is -10.9%, the three-month change is -27.8%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -48.7%. Relative strength versus the KOSPI is 31 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 31% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 45.2%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

31Relative strength vs KOSPI1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 69% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -45.22% / 6M -32.59% / 12M -66.53%

StockKOSPI

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)11.10x
Forward P/E9.43x
P/B0.23x
P/S0.48x
EPS₩72,592
BPS (book value/share)₩3,529,767
Dividend yield0.22%
DPS₩1,750

The P/E of 11.10x is below the sector median (14.79x). The P/B of 0.23x is below the sector median (0.97x). Both metrics are low versus peers, so the price is not expensive relative to earnings and assets.

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt-$276.6M
EV (enterprise value)$360.2M
EV/EBITDA116.70x
EV/Sales0.30x
FCF (free cash flow)-$184.9M
FCF yield-29.04%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Intrinsic value (DCF estimate)

Bear case₩1,057,400
Base case₩1,542,200
Bull case₩2,523,600

DCF (discounted cash flow) estimate — discount rate 9.8%, initial growth 10.0%→terminal 2.0%, 10-yr forecast, earnings-based. A reference range that shifts materially with assumptions.

Profitability & financials

ROE2.06%
Operating margin-1.97%
Net margin4.42%
Debt ratio13.59%
Payout ratio1.77%

Return on equity (ROE) is 2.1%, below the sector average (4.0%). The operating margin is -2.0%. The debt ratio is 13.6%, so the financial structure is stable.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$1.4B$1.3B$1.2B-9.87% ↓ slower
Operating profit-$42.9M-$261,586-$23.9M
Net profit-$12.3M$142.2M$53.6M-62.33%
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$1.7B$1.8B$1.4B$1.3B$1.2B
Operating profit$234.6M-$80.9M-$42.9M-$261,586-$23.9M
Net profit$209.7M$226.5M-$12.3M$142.2M$53.6M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg -8.37%

Revenue fell 9.9% year over year (2023 ₩2.1 trillion → 2024 ₩2.0 trillion → 2025 ₩1.8 trillion), and the three-year trend is 'falling'. The rate of decline widened from the prior year. Operating results are in the red, so a swing back to profit matters more than the growth rate here. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is -8.4%. The two-year revenue CAGR is -7.3%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 9.3% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$353.5M
Revenue YoY+9.27%
Operating profit-$7.6M
Op. profit YoY-229.45%
Net profit$18.8M
Net profit YoY-62.57%

Technical indicators

RSI (14)37.8
MA20₩862,050
MA60₩1,009,567
1-month-10.94%
3-month-27.84%
vs 52-wk high-48.66%

What stands out

  • P/E and P/B are both low versus peers, so the price looks inexpensive relative to earnings and assets.
  • The balance sheet is stable in terms of debt and liquidity.

Points to watch

  • Revenue fell 9.9% year over year (3-year trend: falling).

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
2025 revenue1₩827.4 billionapprox. 1₩827.4 billionConfirmedlink
2025 operating profit/loss-₩36.0 billionConfirmedlink
Net debt (net cash)-₩417.3 billionUnverifiedlink
2026 estimated net profit (asset/earnings-multiple approximation)approx. ₩95.0 billion(self-estimate)Unverified

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.