Lotte Corporation is a holding company that owns stakes in affiliates such as Lotte Shopping (about 40%), Lotte Wellfood (about 47%), Lotte Chilsung Beverage (about 45%) and Lotte Chemical, earning money through dividends, trademark royalties and management-advisory fees; much of its roughly ₩15.5 trillion in consolidated revenue is the combined revenue of the affiliates it consolidates, so 'which affiliates it holds, and how much of each' is what drives corporate value. In 2026, as part of a value-up program, it stated a policy of expanding shareholder returns and reviewing interim dividends and treasury-share retirement, and it decided on a ₩1,250-per-share dividend; in Q1, Lotte Chemical's swing back into the black brought the group's earnings into a recovery phase. The point worth watching is that a large NAV discount - market cap well below the value of its listed holdings - together with a dividend yield in the 5% range and an ongoing value-up program are strengths, while Lotte Chemical, a core pillar of the holding's value, is sensitive to the chemicals cycle so the pace of recovery depends on that cycle, the standalone values of Lotte Shopping and Lotte Wellfood are not low so the NAV discount cannot narrow indefinitely, and holding-company earnings swing with equity-method accounting.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthCaution
  • For financial companies, debt and interest costs are large by the nature of the business, so the debt ratio and interest coverage cannot be read on the same yardstick as an ordinary company.
  • The most recent full-year net result was a loss.
GrowthDeclining
  • Revenue fell 1.4% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 1.0% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityLoss-making
  • ROE is -10.7% (controlling-interest basis). It is below the sector average.
  • Operating margin is 1.5%.
ValuationFairly valued
  • Valued against the net asset value (NAV) of its listed holdings rather than a consolidated P/E — see the in-depth valuation for the detailed basis.

Ownership & governance As of 2019-12-31

Largest shareholder Shin Dong-bin 11.7% (individual)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 17.3%

With the controlling bloc holding 17%, control is maintained but the free float is relatively large.

Net asset value (NAV) assessment Fairly valued39% discount to NAV

💡 How to read a holding company · A holding company owns stakes in several subsidiaries. Its P/E swings with equity-method gains and losses on those stakes, so read it only as a rough guide. P/B is more meaningful because subsidiary stakes sit in equity, but book value carries them at low historical cost (so P/B looks higher than reality). The most accurate view is the price against the market value of those stakes (NAV)

Valued against the net asset value (NAV) of its listed holdings rather than a consolidated P/E — see the in-depth valuation for the detailed basis.

Listed subsidiaries ownership

Lotte Innovate66.1%
Lotte Wellfood48.13%
Lotte Chilsung Beverage45%
Lotte Shopping40%
Lotte Chemical25.31%
Lotte Chilsung Beverage21.14%

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Lotte Corporation is not a company that makes and sells goods directly; it is a holding company that owns stakes in the listed and unlisted affiliates of the Lotte Group and earns money through their dividends, trademark (brand) royalties and management-advisory fees.
  • Its core holdings are Lotte Shopping in retail (about 40%), Lotte Wellfood (about 47%) and Lotte Chilsung Beverage (about 45%) in food, and Lotte Chemical in chemicals.
  • Much of its consolidated revenue (about ₩15.5 trillion) is the combined revenue of consolidated affiliates, so corporate value is driven less by the holding company's own results than by 'which affiliates it holds and how much of each.' Lotte Chemical and Lotte Shopping had long been the big pillars of dividend income, but as chemical dividends shrank during the chemicals downturn, the relative contribution of the food and retail affiliates grew.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩22,950 and market capitalization is ₩2.3 trillion.
  • The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩24,688) and below its 60-day line (₩26,742).
  • Trading below both the short- and mid-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (an indicator that gauges upward versus downward momentum over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 39.0, a neutral level.
  • The one-month change is -10.7%, the three-month change is -14.8%, and the price sits -40.5% from its 52-week high.
  • Relative strength versus the KOSPI is 14 (on a 1-99 scale that weights recent returns against the index over the past year more heavily toward the recent period; higher means stronger than the market), placing it in roughly the top 86% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it lagged the index by 34.7%.
  • Chart readings are best considered alongside trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • As a holding company, standard metrics are hard to apply as-is.
  • Net profit and loss for 2025 was a loss of -₩647.6 billion, largely because Lotte Chemical's chemical losses flowed through via equity-method accounting (which reflects an affiliate's profit or loss in proportion to the stake held).
  • The P/E ratio (how many times a year's profit the share price represents) is therefore not calculable, so this company is hard to judge by P/E.
  • The P/B (how many times book equity the share price represents) is 0.38x, which looks very low, but book equity carries affiliate stakes at low historical cost and thus underreflects their actual holding value.
  • The debt ratio (borrowings relative to equity) of 224.6% is also inflated somewhat by financial-nature affiliates in the mix and should not be read against a general manufacturing yardstick.
  • The dividend yield is 5.3% (₩1,250 per share), on the high side, and this dividend is paid out of dividends received from affiliates.
🚀Growth
  • Revenue was ₩15.5 trillion in 2025, a slight contraction of -1.4% year on year, and operating profit fell 29.7% to ₩239.4 billion, a third straight year of declining profit.
  • Net profit and loss went from a slight loss in 2023 to large losses in 2024 and 2025, the cumulative result of chemical down-cycle losses flowing through via equity-method accounting.
  • The inflection point, however, is Q1 2026.
  • Consolidated revenue was ₩3.62 trillion (+1.0%) and operating profit ₩46.1 billion, about 2.6 times the year-earlier figure, while net profit and loss swung back into the black (+₩14.5 billion).
  • The key point is that Lotte Chemical returned to an operating profit for the first time in ten quarters, and food and retail affiliates such as Lotte Chilsung, Lotte Wellfood and Korea Seven also improved.
  • Last year's large loss was strongly one-off in nature, tied to the chemical trough, so as the chemicals cycle passes its bottom, equity-method profit normalizes and the holding company's net profit and loss follows a recovery track.
  • Given that holding-company earnings are driven by equity-method accounting on affiliate stakes and swing sharply from year to year, and with no official company outlook, we do not pin down a precise net-profit figure for this year.
📰Recent news & filings
  • Through 2026, disclosures related to affiliate management and shareholder returns have continued.
  • As part of a value-up program, the company stated a policy of expanding shareholder returns and reviewing interim dividends and treasury-share retirement, and it decided on a regular cash and in-kind dividend (₩1,250 per share).
  • In May it held an investor presentation (IR) sharing its Q1 report, group results and portfolio strategy, and disclosed management matters at an affiliate (the Lotte Chemical group) - including a capital reduction, a production halt, loans and debt guarantees - as material affiliate management matters.
  • Restructuring-type measures at the chemical affiliate are a short-term burden but can be read as a mid-term improvement in fundamentals during a cyclical recovery.
🧭Bottom line
  • The observation points are clear.
  • The strengths are that (1) the company sits at an NAV discount, with market cap well below the value of its listed holdings, (2) a high dividend yield in the 5% range and a value-up program (expanded shareholder returns, treasury-share retirement under review) are in progress, and (3) Lotte Chemical's return to the black in Q1 2026 brought group earnings into a recovery phase.
  • The cautions are that (1) Lotte Chemical, a core pillar of the holding's value, is sensitive to the chemicals cycle so the pace of recovery depends on that cycle, (2) the standalone values of the largest affiliates, Lotte Shopping and Lotte Wellfood, are not low, so the NAV discount cannot narrow indefinitely, and (3) holding-company earnings swing quarter to quarter and year to year with equity-method accounting.
  • In short, if the chemicals cycle recovers and retail and food stay firm, there is ample room for the NAV discount to narrow, while if chemicals wobble again the stability of the dividend and the quality of the affiliates serve as the line of defense.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Undervalued

Compared against Korea's leading holding companies - contrasted with LG, CJ and Hanwha, which share the common feature that as operating holding companies the value of their listed affiliate stakes is central to corporate value.

PeerP/EP/BROE
LG Corp21.19x0.54x2.57%
CJ Corporation27.91x0.77x2.75%
Hanwha17.34x0.55x3.15%

As a holding company, Lotte Corporation is better viewed by the net asset value (NAV) of its holdings than by P/E or P/B. Market cap sits on the deep side of the usual holding-company discount range (30-50%) relative to the value of its listed holdings, and even against peer holdings (LG, CJ, Hanwha) the 0.39x P/B is on the low side. This discount does not by itself mean undervaluation, however, since among the core affiliates Lotte Chemical is sensitive to the chemicals cycle while Lotte Shopping and Lotte Wellfood have standalone values that are not low, which partly justifies the discount. Even so, because (a) at the current price the NAV discount is on the deep side of the usual range, (b) chemicals returned to the black in Q1 and earnings have moved onto a recovery track, and (c) a dividend yield in the 5% range and treasury-share retirement under review support the downside, we view the current position as undervalued. The fact that the P/E is not calculable due to last year's trailing loss is merely a characteristic of an earnings-inflection stock; the basis for the valuation judgment is NAV.

₩22,950 -4.37%
Market cap $1.5B

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩22,950 and the market capitalization is ₩2.3 trillion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩24,688) and below its 60-day moving average (₩26,742). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 39.0, a neutral level. The one-month change is -10.7%, the three-month change is -14.8%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -40.5%. Relative strength versus the KOSPI is 14 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 14% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 34.7%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

14Relative strength vs KOSPI1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 86% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -34.69% / 6M -46.05% / 12M -66.24%

StockKOSPI

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)
P/B0.38x
P/S0.13x
EPS₩-6,497
BPS (book value/share)₩60,968
Dividend yield5.45%
DPS₩1,250

A net loss makes the P/E an unreliable valuation gauge. The P/B of 0.38x is below the sector median (0.49x).

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt$4.9B
EV (enterprise value)$6.4B
EV/EBIT40.61x
EV/EBITDA8.10x
EV/Sales0.63x
FCF (free cash flow)-$138.5M
FCF yield-8.70%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Profitability & financials

ROE-10.66%
Operating margin1.54%
Net margin-4.17%
Debt ratio224.63%
Payout ratio-14.80%

Return on equity (ROE) is -10.7%, below the sector average (5.0%). The operating margin is 1.5%. The debt ratio is 224.6%, but for financial firms deposits and insurance liabilities count as debt, so it cannot be read on the same yardstick as an ordinary company.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$10.0B$10.4B$10.3B-1.38% ↓ slower
Operating profit$327.2M$225.7M$158.7M-29.67% ↑ faster
Net profit-$10.2M-$675.2M-$429.2M
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$6.6B$9.4B$10.0B$10.4B$10.3B
Operating profit$143.4M$324.6M$327.2M$225.7M$158.7M
Net profit$204.5M$113.2M-$10.2M-$675.2M-$429.2M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg 11.86%

Revenue fell 1.4% year over year (2023 ₩15.2 trillion → 2024 ₩15.8 trillion → 2025 ₩15.5 trillion), and the three-year trend is 'mixed'. The rate of decline widened from the prior year. Operating profit fell 29.7% year over year. That said, the decline narrowed. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 11.9%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 1.2%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 1.0% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$2.4B
Revenue YoY+1.03%
Operating profit$30.5M
Op. profit YoY+156.62%
Net profit$9.6M
Net profit YoY

Technical indicators

RSI (14)39.0
MA20₩24,688
MA60₩26,742
1-month-10.70%
3-month-14.84%
vs 52-wk high-40.54%

What stands out

  • The dividend yield, at 5.5%, is on the high side.

Points to watch

  • For financial companies, debt and interest costs are large by the nature of the business, so the debt ratio and interest coverage cannot be read on the same yardstick as an ordinary company.
  • The most recent full-year net result was a loss.
  • The most recent full year was a loss, so it is worth checking whether profitability recovers.
  • Revenue fell 1.4% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
Dividend per share (DPS)₩1,250Confirmedlink
Q1 2026 results (revenue and operating profit)revenue ₩3.62 trillion(+1.0%), operating profit ₩46.1 billion2026 1 (2026.03)Confirmedlink
P/B0.39xUnverifiedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.