KINX makes money from 'the back-end infrastructure that keeps the internet running,' centered on subscription-style infrastructure revenue across four lines: the country's only carrier-neutral IX (internet exchange), IDC data centers that lease server space, CloudHub that connects companies to external clouds, and a CDN that delivers content quickly, all charging monthly circuit and space usage fees. Its May 12 preliminary results and May 15 quarterly report confirmed a Q1 earnings recovery in which operating and net profit growth far outpaced revenue growth, and on March 30 it reported the outcome of a treasury-share disposal. What stands out is that its strengths are the entry barrier of being the country's only neutral IX, subscription-style revenue, the sharp Q1 rebound in operating and net profit, and a forward P/E of 17.8x that is lower than infrastructure peers (Douzone Bizon, Gabia); on the other hand, ROE at 8.4% still trails the peer average, and because the earnings recovery has been confirmed in a single quarter, whether the same trend continues through the full year needs further watching.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthStable
  • Debt ratio, current ratio and interest burden all look healthy.
GrowthGrowing
  • Revenue rose 14.6% year over year, and the pace is quickening (3-year trend: rising).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 7.9% higher than a year earlier.
  • Even versus the prior quarter (Q4 2025), revenue was 3.2% higher.
ProfitabilityHealthy
  • ROE is 8.4% (controlling-interest basis). It is below the sector average.
  • Operating margin is 15.0%.
ValuationOvervalued
  • P/B is high versus peers, a stretch on an asset basis.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Gabia 36.3% (corporate)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 39.1%

With the controlling bloc holding 39%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • KINX makes money from 'the back-end infrastructure that keeps the internet running.' It has four core lines.
  • (1) The IX (internet exchange, a hub that connects different networks in one place so they can exchange traffic) is the country's only carrier-neutral one, connecting ISPs and content providers without being tied to any single carrier.
  • (2) The IDC (data center, a facility that stores and operates servers on customers' behalf) leases server space (colocation) across six domestic centers plus bases in Hong Kong and Japan.
  • (3) Cloud connectivity (CloudHub) securely links companies to external clouds such as AWS, Azure, Google and Naver Cloud over dedicated circuits.
  • (4) The CDN (midibus) delivers video and live-commerce content quickly.
  • In short, revenue is centered on subscription-style infrastructure in which customers who move in or connect once pay monthly circuit and space usage fees, so a growing customer base steadily accumulates into revenue.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest closing price is ₩133,600 and the market capitalization is ₩652.0 billion.
  • The price sits above its 20-day line (₩117,950) and above its 60-day line (₩113,752).
  • Trading above both the short- and medium-term moving averages, the trend is fairly healthy.
  • The RSI (a supplementary gauge that measures upward versus downward force over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 66.4, a neutral level.
  • The one-month change is +18.3%, the three-month change is +29.5%, and the position versus the 52-week high is -5.0%.
  • Relative strength against the KOSDAQ is 91 (on a 1-99 scale that converts return versus the index over the past year, weighting recent performance more heavily; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it in roughly the top 8% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it has outpaced the index by 78.4%.
  • Chart reading is best done alongside trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • On a confirmed annual (2025) basis, the P/E ratio (how many times one year's net profit the price represents) is 38.13x and the P/B (how many times net assets) is 3.19x.
  • However, this figure is based on 'last year's confirmed results' (trailing) just before earnings began to rebound, so it has the limitation of making the stock look more expensive than it really is now that earnings have started to grow quickly.
  • The forward P/E (price multiple based on the next year's earnings), reflecting this year's expected earnings, is 17.8x, positioned below infrastructure peers (Douzone Bizon 37.9x, Gabia 25.1x), so relative to future earnings it is actually not heavy.
  • ROE (return on equity, how much is earned in a year on equity) is 8.4%, still below the peer average (about 12%), but the operating margin is 15.0%, so core-business profitability is solid.
  • The debt ratio (debt to equity) is 165.5%, which looks high on the number alone, but that reflects the nature of a data-center business that uses borrowings and lease liabilities for capital investment.
  • With a current ratio of 298% and an interest coverage ratio (how many times operating profit covers interest) of 7.3x, short-term solvency and interest-servicing capacity are ample, so cash-generation adequately supports that debt.
🚀Growth
  • Over five years revenue nearly doubled, from ₩84.5 billion in 2021 to ₩159.2 billion in 2025, and the latest revenue growth rate of 14.6% is actually faster than the prior year's (13.2%).
  • Revenue keeps rising steadily because monthly subscription-style usage fees accumulate as data-center tenancy and cloud-connectivity customers grow.
  • Net profit passed ₩25.5 billion in 2022, then declined to ₩18.1 billion in 2024 and ₩17.1 billion in 2025, so for a while there was a stretch where revenue growth and profit moved apart.
  • That trend clearly changed in Q1 2026.
  • With revenue of ₩42.5 billion (+7.9%), operating profit of ₩8.9 billion (+79.5%) and net profit of ₩7.7 billion (+132.3%), profit grew far faster than revenue.
  • This is a sign that operating leverage has begun to work: as data-center and cloud revenue passes a certain scale, everything beyond covering fixed costs falls straight through to profit.
  • On this year's higher earnings, the forward P/E works out to 17.8x, down to about half of last year's 38.1x.
  • In other words, the forward figure is not a suddenly inflated number but the result of the earnings recovery actually confirmed in Q1 being applied across the full year.
  • That said, whether this recovery steps up another level from next year onward is something only visible as more quarters accumulate, so there is no basis to declare this the top of the cycle.
📰Recent news & filings
  • Recent disclosures can be summarized as the company transparently reporting results each quarter and clearing out its treasury shares.
  • In the May 12, 2026 preliminary-results fair disclosures (two filings, separate and consolidated), Q1 revenue, operating profit and net profit were first announced, and the May 15, 2026 quarterly report confirmed the same figures.
  • Operating and net profit growth rates far exceeded revenue growth, so the earnings recovery was backed by actual results.
  • Beforehand, on March 30, 2026, the outcome of a treasury-share disposal was reported, disclosing that the company had resold shares it held into the market.
  • A treasury-share disposal should be viewed together with the aspect of the company securing cash and the aspect of a possible partial dilution of per-share value as the number of shares in circulation increases.
  • Subsequently, from April to June, there were several filings on changes in holdings of specified securities by executives and major shareholders, which are of a routine reporting nature and do not by themselves point to the direction of results.
🧭Bottom line
  • The strengths are clear.
  • (1) The entry barrier of being the country's only neutral IX, plus subscription-style infrastructure revenue on which monthly usage fees accumulate; (2) the sharp simultaneous rebound in operating and net profit in Q1 2026; and (3) a financial structure where, even though the debt ratio looks high, liquidity and interest-servicing capacity provide support.
  • In particular, this year's forward P/E of 17.8x is lower than infrastructure peers (Douzone Bizon 37.9x, Gabia 25.1x), so relative to future earnings the price is not heavy.
  • Points to watch together: (1) ROE at 8.4% still trails the peer average, and (2) because the earnings recovery has been confirmed in a single quarter, whether the same trend continues through the full year needs further watching.
  • In short, this stock is structured so that 'if the earnings rebound extends through the year, it looks like an infrastructure name cheap relative to future earnings at the 17x forward level, while if it slows again, last year's 38x-range burden re-emerges,' making the durability of quarterly earnings the key variable separating strong from weak phases.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Inconclusive

Because KINX is an internet-infrastructure business selling IDC, IX and cloud connectivity rather than a consumer platform, the peer set was drawn from companies of the same character that handle domain, hosting and cloud infrastructure rather than large portals.

PeerP/EP/BROE
Gabia26.47x2.36x8.93%
Cafe2410.14x1.49x14.69%
Douzone Bizon37.86x5.68x15.01%

On a confirmed-results basis, the P/E of 32.7x and P/B of 2.73x sit in the upper half of infrastructure peers (Gabia 26.3x, Cafe24 12.0x, Douzone Bizon 37.9x). However, this trailing P/E is calculated on 2025 results just before earnings rebounded, so at an earnings-inflection point it has the limitation of looking more expensive than it really is. Reflecting the confirmed Q1 results this year, the seasonality-approximated forward P/E is about 14.2x, which actually moves toward the lower end within the same peer group. In other words, this is a phase where 'it looks expensive on last year's numbers but the burden drops sharply if the earnings rebound extends through the year,' so until it is confirmed that Q1 earnings persist without one-off factors, calling it undervalued or overvalued is difficult. That said, being an infrastructure business with a clear entry barrier is a factor that justifies a certain level of premium.

Earnings outlook company-stated · verified

TypePeriodRevenueOperating profitNet profit
Next quarterQ2 2026approx. ₩43.8 billionapprox. ₩10.0 billionapprox. ₩9.9 billion
₩133,600 +2.85%
Market cap $432.1M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩133,600 and the market capitalization is ₩652.0 billion. The price sits above its 20-day moving average (₩117,950) and above its 60-day moving average (₩113,752). It holds above both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks healthy. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 66.4, a neutral level. The one-month change is +18.3%, the three-month change is +29.5%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -5.0%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 91 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 92% of all stocks. Over the past three months it outpaced the index by 78.4%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

91Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 8% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M +78.39% / 6M +35.63% / 12M +47.50%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)38.13x
Forward P/E16.61x
P/B3.19x
Forward P/B2.19x
P/S4.07x
EPS₩3,504
BPS (book value/share)₩41,841
Dividend yield0.45%
DPS₩600

The P/E of 38.13x is above the sector median (14.81x). The P/B of 3.19x is above the sector median (1.11x). That said, this P/E is based on last year's (trailing) results. With recent quarterly earnings up sharply, the trailing P/E can look higher than it really is, so a precise read is best done on this year's expected (forward) earnings.

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt$27.9M
EV (enterprise value)$380.7M
EV/EBIT24.05x
EV/EBITDA11.60x
EV/Sales3.61x
FCF (free cash flow)$29.3M
FCF yield8.31%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Intrinsic value (DCF estimate)

Bear case₩227,100
Base case₩326,000
Bull case₩512,400

DCF (discounted cash flow) estimate — discount rate 10.7%, initial growth 10.0%→terminal 2.0%, 10-yr forecast, free-cash-flow basis, forward earnings power normalized 2.296x. A reference range that shifts materially with assumptions.

Profitability & financials

ROE8.37%
Operating margin15.00%
Net margin10.74%
Debt ratio165.48%
Payout ratio17.00%

Return on equity (ROE) is 8.4%, below the sector average (12.0%). The operating margin is 15.0%. The debt ratio is 165.5%, so the financial structure is moderate.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$81.3M$92.1M$105.5M+14.64% ↑ faster
Operating profit$17.6M$15.7M$15.8M+0.64% ↑ faster
Net profit$16.4M$12.0M$11.3M-5.38% ↑ faster
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$56.0M$73.5M$81.3M$92.1M$105.5M
Operating profit$13.1M$17.1M$17.6M$15.7M$15.8M
Net profit$10.5M$16.9M$16.4M$12.0M$11.3M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg 17.18%

Revenue rose 14.6% year over year (2023 ₩122.7 billion → 2024 ₩138.9 billion → 2025 ₩159.2 billion), and the three-year trend is 'rising'. The pace of growth also quickened from the prior year. Operating profit rose 0.6% year over year. Profit is growing at an accelerating pace. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 17.2%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 13.9%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 7.9% higher than the same period a year earlier. Because quarterly results are relatively even in this industry, revenue also came in 3.2% higher than the prior quarter (Q4 2025), so the recent trend looks solid.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago + prior quarter

Revenue$28.2M
Revenue YoY+7.93%
Operating profit$5.9M
Op. profit YoY+79.53%
Net profit$5.1M
Net profit YoY+132.29%
Revenue QoQ+3.19%
Op. profit QoQ+28.35%

Technical indicators

RSI (14)66.4
MA20₩117,950
MA60₩113,752
1-month+18.33%
3-month+29.46%
vs 52-wk high-4.98%

What stands out

  • Revenue grew 14.6% year over year, a sign of growth.
  • The balance sheet is stable in terms of debt and liquidity.

Points to watch

  • The price is high versus peers, so expectations already appear priced in.

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
Q1 2026 revenue / operating profit / net profitrevenue ₩42.5 billion · operating profit ₩8.9 billion · net profit ₩7.7 billionDART (2026.03)Confirmedlink
Five-year annual revenue trend2021 ₩84.5 billion → 2025 ₩159.2 billionDARTUnverifiedlink
This year's seasonality-approximated operating profit / net profitoperating profit approx. ₩37.7 billion · net profit approx. ₩39.3 billion (forward PER approx. 14.2x)Unverifiedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.