Genexine is a drug-development company that uses its own proprietary platform technologies to develop cancer immunotherapies, long-acting antibody-fusion proteins, and gene-therapy vaccines. Rather than selling products today, it is at the stage of advancing candidate molecules into clinical development to create value through licensing-out and commercialization. In September 2025 it secured about ₩19.4 billion of operating funds through a convertible bond issue (conversion price ₩5,478), and a February 2026 annual-results filing confirmed revenue of ₩4.6 billion, an operating loss of ₩36.2 billion and a net loss of ₩27.2 billion. The key thing to note is a two-sided picture: strengths include a P/B of 0.42x — trading at less than half of net asset value, below the peer range (1.5-2.7x) — and a rapidly narrowing net loss; on the other hand, it is still at a stage where revenue does not cover the loss, so the current ratio of 39.2% and the future dilution potential from the convertible bond must be weighed, and if clinical delays or an additional capital raise overlap, the net-asset cushion thins.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthCaution
  • Assets that can be turned to cash within a year fall short of near-term liabilities (current ratio 39.2%).
  • The most recent full-year net result was a loss.
GrowthHigh growth
  • Revenue rose 56.0% year over year, and the pace is quickening (3-year trend: mixed).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 29.8% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityLoss-making
  • ROE is -11.0% (controlling-interest basis). It is above the sector average.
  • Operating margin is -790.8%.
ValuationUndervalued
  • P/E is hard to compute here, so this is read on P/B.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Handok 13.28% (corporate)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 13.28%

With the controlling bloc holding 13%, ownership is dispersed, leaving room for control-related or activist dynamics.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Genexine develops biologic new drugs on the strength of its own platform technologies.
  • According to its periodic filings, its drug candidates fall broadly into three streams: cancer immunotherapies that attack cancer through the immune system, long-acting antibody-fusion protein therapeutics designed for sustained efficacy, and gene-therapy vaccines.
  • In other words, rather than a company that earns by selling products today, it is a drug developer that creates value by advancing candidate molecules through research and clinical stages toward licensing-out or commercialization.
  • That is why, more than quarterly revenue itself, the clinical progress of the pipeline and the funding situation are the keys to understanding this company.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩2,310 and the market cap is ₩105.2 billion.
  • The price sits below both its 20-day (₩2,628) and 60-day (₩4,050) moving averages.
  • Trading below both the short- and mid-term averages, the trend looks subdued.
  • The RSI (a supplementary gauge comparing upward and downward force over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 29.4, near oversold territory.
  • The price is down 22.7% over one month and 49.7% over three months, and stands 67.5% below its 52-week high.
  • Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 29 (on a 1-99 scale that weights recent returns against the index over the past year more heavily; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it in roughly the top 71% by strength among all stocks.
  • Over the past three months it has lagged the index by 31.3%.
  • Chart readings are best considered alongside trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • On a recent annual basis, revenue was ₩4.6 billion against an operating loss of ₩36.2 billion and a net loss of ₩27.2 billion, still a loss-making structure in which R&D spending greatly exceeds revenue.
  • With no profit, the P/E (how many times one year's earnings the price is) cannot be computed, so the P/B (how many times book value the price is) is used instead.
  • Equity is ₩246.7 billion while the market cap is about ₩104.7 billion, putting the P/B at 0.42x — the stock trades at less than half of the company's net asset value.
  • Set against a comparable R&D peer group at P/B of 1.5-2.7x, it is clearly cheap on an asset basis.
  • That said, for this company value hinges on assets and cash on hand rather than earnings, so the debt ratio of 150.5% and the current ratio of 39.2% (the ratio of assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year) must be viewed together.
  • If the case for undervaluation rests on net assets, then how slowly those net assets are consumed by R&D spending is the accompanying question.
🚀Growth
  • Revenue itself is small and uneven, as befits the drug-development stage.
  • The most meaningful change, though, is that the loss is narrowing.
  • The net loss shrank by more than half, from ₩66.9 billion in 2023 and ₩63.7 billion in 2024 to ₩27.2 billion in 2025, and the operating loss eased from ₩41.2 billion to ₩36.2 billion.
  • Revenue rose 56.0% year on year, and the most recent quarter (Q1 2026) was also up 29.8% versus the same period a year earlier.
  • For a drug-development company, this pattern can be read as a sign of cost control and the start of some technology fees and contract revenue coming in.
  • That said, with quarterly revenue at just the ₩0.4 billion level, it can swing sharply on the presence or absence of a single deal or two, so whether the trend firms up is worth confirming over the coming quarters.
  • This year's revenue outlook (about ₩1.3 billion) is a reference figure that stitches together the quarterly trend, and it must be viewed alongside the fact that this company's value comes from clinical progress rather than the revenue figure.
📰Recent news & filings
  • The disclosure flow centers on financing and results.
  • In September 2025 a convertible bond issue secured about ₩19.4 billion of operating funds (conversion price ₩5,478); for a loss-making drug developer, this is a two-sided filing — a positive in that fresh funds arrive to keep clinical work going, and a caution in that share count may later rise and dilute per-share value.
  • In February 2026 an annual results-change filing confirmed revenue of ₩4.6 billion, an operating loss of ₩36.2 billion and a net loss of ₩27.2 billion, in line with the narrowing-loss trend noted above.
  • From here, the points to watch are which pipeline the secured funds go toward and whether they lead to value events such as clinical progress or technology transfers.
🧭Bottom line
  • This stock's strengths and weaknesses split fairly clearly.
  • The strength is price relative to assets.
  • At a P/B of 0.42x it trades at less than half of net asset value, clearly below the peer group (1.5-2.7x), and the net loss is narrowing quickly.
  • In the short term, too, it sits at a heavily sold-off level with an RSI of 21.5.
  • The weakness lies in the business stage itself: as a drug developer that cannot yet cover its loss with revenue, the rate at which cash on hand is depleted, the current ratio of 39.2%, and the future dilution potential from the convertible bond all have to be weighed.
  • In short, if clinical work progresses, the loss keeps narrowing, and the company can hold on without further financing, the undervaluation relative to assets stands out; conversely, if clinical delays or cash depletion and an additional capital raise overlap, the net-asset cushion thins.
  • It should be viewed with an understanding that the pipeline and cash — not revenue — drive the share price.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Undervalued

A peer set of R&D-focused names with nearby market capitalization.

PeerP/EP/BROE
Aptabio Therapeutics2.50x-34.64%
TiumBio2.95x-46.05%
Vaxcell-Bio1.58x-21.82%

Within R&D-focused names, public-data peers with nearby market capitalization were looked at first. The current P/E (how many times one year's earnings the price is) is not available, and the P/B (how many times book value the price is) is 0.43x. That said, for smaller-cap names, earnings swings and financing disclosures carry a large effect, so no firm conclusion was drawn from last year's confirmed-results metrics alone. The basis for the outlook box is a DART seasonality approximation.

Earnings outlook company-stated · verified

TypePeriodRevenueOperating profitNet profit
This year2026₩1.3 billion
Next quarterQ2 2026₩0.3 billion
₩2,310 -0.65%
Market cap $69.7M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩2,310 and the market capitalization is ₩105.2 billion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩2,628) and below its 60-day moving average (₩4,050). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 29.4, near oversold territory. The one-month change is -22.7%, the three-month change is -49.7%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -67.5%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 29 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 29% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 31.3%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

29Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 71% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -31.30% / 6M -40.12% / 12M -54.21%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)
P/B0.43x
P/S23.00x
EPS₩-598
BPS (book value/share)₩5,418
Dividend yield
DPS

A net loss makes the P/E an unreliable valuation gauge. The P/B of 0.43x is below the sector median (7.05x).

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt$65.4M
EV (enterprise value)$139.5M
EV/Sales46.02x
FCF (free cash flow)-$29.4M
FCF yield-39.66%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Profitability & financials

ROE-11.03%
Operating margin-790.84%
Net margin-595.01%
Debt ratio150.46%
Payout ratio

The operating margin is -790.8%. The debt ratio is 150.5%, so the financial structure is moderate.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (separate)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$2.9M$1.9M$3.0M+55.96% ↑ faster
Operating profit-$27.3M-$24.7M-$24.0M
Net profit-$44.3M-$42.2M-$18.0M
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$24.4M$10.7M$2.9M$1.9M$3.0M
Operating profit-$12.8M-$22.3M-$27.3M-$24.7M-$24.0M
Net profit-$32.4M-$37.7M-$44.3M-$42.2M-$18.0M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg -40.64%

Revenue rose 56.0% year over year (2023 ₩4.4 billion → 2024 ₩2.9 billion → 2025 ₩4.6 billion), and the three-year trend is 'mixed'. The pace of growth also quickened from the prior year. Operating results are in the red, so a swing back to profit matters more than the growth rate here. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is -40.6%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 1.7%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 29.8% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$274,875
Revenue YoY+29.80%
Operating profit-$6.0M
Op. profit YoY
Net profit-$8.2M
Net profit YoY

Technical indicators

RSI (14)29.4
MA20₩2,628
MA60₩4,050
1-month-22.74%
3-month-49.73%
vs 52-wk high-67.46%

What stands out

  • P/E and P/B are both low versus peers, so the price looks inexpensive relative to earnings and assets.
  • Revenue grew 56.0% year over year, a sign of growth.

Points to watch

  • Assets that can be turned to cash within a year fall short of near-term liabilities (current ratio 39.2%).
  • The most recent full-year net result was a loss.
  • The most recent full year was a loss, so it is worth checking whether profitability recovers.

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
Closing price₩2,310₩2,310Confirmedlink
Latest quarterly resultsrevenue ₩0.4 billion, operating profit -₩9.0 billionrevenue ₩0.4 billion, operating profit -₩9.0 billionConfirmedlink
Annual resultsrevenue ₩4.6 billion, operating profit -₩36.2 billionrevenue ₩4.6 billion, operating profit -₩36.2 billionConfirmedlink
Financing disclosure (original text)[]: ₩5,478 · ₩159[]: ₩5,478 · ₩159Confirmedlink
Financing disclosure (original text): ₩5,478 · ₩19.4 billion: ₩5,478 · ₩19.4 billionConfirmedlink
Results disclosure (original text)revenue30%: revenue ₩4.6 billion · operating profit -₩36.2 billion · net profit -₩27.2 billionrevenue30%: revenue ₩4.6 billion · operating profit -₩36.2 billion · net profit -₩27.2 billionConfirmedlink
Outlook-box basisDARTDARTConfirmedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.