Oriental Precision & Engineering builds around two pillars: marine cranes used on cargo ships and container ships (with roughly 70% domestic share, effectively the top position) and deck houses, the living quarters and structures on ships. As of Q1 2026 the two segments split roughly evenly, and with major shipyards such as Samsung Heavy Industries as key customers, results are heavily tied to the shipbuilding cycle. Recent disclosures center on regular reports and shareholder-meeting procedures: Q1 cumulative revenue of about ₩56.4 billion (+10.6%) confirmed a recovery in scale, and the business report reconfirmed the two-segment makeup and the Samsung Heavy Industries-centered customer base. What stands out lately is that its roughly 70% domestic crane share, 15.3% ROE, and forward P/B of 1.47x, low versus peers, together read as undervaluation if a shipbuilding-order recovery feeds through to revenue; on the other hand, deck house revenue is concentrated in a few large customers so results can swing with order timing, and with a 190% debt ratio and Q1 profit not keeping pace with revenue, cost and currency factors need watching too.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthModerate
GrowthDeclining
  • Revenue fell 0.0% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 10.6% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityStrong
  • ROE is 15.3% (controlling-interest basis). It is above the sector average.
  • Operating margin is 11.7%.
ValuationUndervalued
  • The P/E sits below the sector median.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Oriental Inspection & Development 45.77% (corporate)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 46.04%

With the controlling bloc holding 46%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Oriental Precision & Engineering earns money mainly along two lines.
  • One is marine cranes (deck cranes, lifeboat cranes, hose-handling cranes and the like used on cargo ships and container ships), and the other is deck houses, the living quarters and structures on ships.
  • As of Q1 2026 the revenue split between the two lines is roughly even.
  • In marine cranes it holds about 70% domestic share, effectively the top position, and its deck houses also count major shipyards such as Samsung Heavy Industries as key customers, so the company's results are heavily tied to the shipbuilding cycle.
  • Put simply, its revenue depends on how many ships are built and what is placed on them.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest closing price is ₩4,305 and the market capitalization is ₩19.62 billion.
  • The price sits below its 20-day line (₩5,042) and below its 60-day line (₩6,294).
  • Trading below both its short- and medium-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (an auxiliary gauge that scores the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 31.8, a neutral level.
  • The one-month change is -17.7%, the three-month change is -32.2%, and the position versus the 52-week high is -65.7%.
  • Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 48 (1-99, converting return versus the index over the past year with more weight on recent periods; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it around the top 52% for strength among all stocks.
  • Over the past three months it has lagged the index by 13.0%.
  • Chart reading is best done together with trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • Starting with valuation metrics, at the current price the P/E ratio on last year's (2025) confirmed earnings (how many times one year's profit the price is) is 11.46x and the P/B (how many times the company's net assets the price is) is 1.75x.
  • This trailing P/E looks somewhat high because 2024 saw net profit jump sharply (+192% year on year), and then in 2025, by that base effect, it pulled back -26.5%, and that one year's figure sits in the denominator.
  • In other words, it is not that the metric is expensive but largely that the prior year's profit was temporarily lower.
  • In fact, the forward P/B based on this year's forecast earnings is 1.57x, lower than the trailing figure, and low even against peers in machinery and equipment.
  • Profitability is solid, with ROE (how much was earned in a year on shareholders' equity) of 15.3%, an operating margin of 11.7%, and a net margin of 9.2%.
  • As for finances, the debt ratio is high at about 190% and the current ratio is 1.03x, but the interest coverage ratio of 13.4x means operating profit comfortably covers interest costs, so given the nature of the shipbuilding-materials sector, with heavy advance payments and working-capital turnover, the burden is not excessive.
🚀Growth
  • Five-year revenue has grown steadily from ₩115.9 billion in 2021 to ₩207.3 billion in 2025, an average of about 15.6% a year.
  • Looking at 2025 alone, revenue was essentially flat versus 2024 (-0.0%), operating profit was -2.4%, and net profit was -26.5%, a pause for breath, but this is largely a base effect after 2024's earnings jumped sharply once.
  • And most recently, Q1 2026 cumulative revenue rose 10.6% year on year, so the scale is back on a growth track.
  • The basis for this year's forecast earnings coming in at this level is clear.
  • As global shipbuilding orders revive, orders for both marine cranes and deck houses are rising together; the company, with about 70% domestic crane share, is positioned to capture the order recovery directly; and the deck house order backlog for major shipyards feeds into revenue up to future delivery.
  • This demand, share, and backlog underpin this year's forward earnings.
  • That said, in the Q1 cumulative figures operating profit (-2.6%) and net profit (-10.9%) did not keep pace with the revenue increase, a cost and currency factor, so how quickly the revenue recovery feeds through to an earnings recovery is a point to watch.
📰Recent news & filings
  • Recent disclosures center on regular reports (the Q1 2026 quarterly report and the 2025 business report) and shareholder-meeting-related procedures.
  • Q1 cumulative revenue of about ₩56.4 billion (+10.6%) put the recovery in scale into numbers, and the business report reconfirmed the two-segment makeup of cranes and deck houses and the Samsung Heavy Industries-centered customer base.
  • The regular general meeting and the filing of the audit report are routine procedures at the fiscal-year close and are not events that change the company's results themselves.
  • In sum, the disclosure flow is of a kind that confirms, at the level of regular reports, the fact that the top line is growing again.
🧭Bottom line
  • This is a stock with clear strengths.
  • Its roughly 70% domestic share in marine cranes, its 15.3% ROE profitability, and a forward P/B of 1.47x on this year's forecast earnings, low versus peers, combine into a mix that reads as a price cheap relative to earnings if a shipbuilding-order recovery feeds through to revenue.
  • At the same time, there are clear points to examine.
  • Deck house revenue is concentrated in a few large customers such as Samsung Heavy Industries, so results can swing with customer order timing, and the 190% debt ratio and Q1 profit not keeping pace with revenue are points to watch alongside cost and currency trends.
  • In sum, this is a stock in which the appeal of its forward valuation comes alive when the shipbuilding cycle and order backlog feed into revenue and cost and currency stabilize, and one in which the earnings recovery can be delayed if orders cool or cost pressure grows.
  • The price has fallen sharply, but looking only at business fundamentals and valuation, there are not a few strengths worth keeping in view.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Undervalued

The peer set is shipbuilding upstream suppliers that make materials and structures going directly into ship construction. Sejin Heavy Industries, whose business is closest in deck houses and cabin structures; HD Hyundai Marine Engine, in ship machinery (engines); and SK Oceanplant, centered on offshore structures, are grouped as riding the same shipbuilding cycle.

PeerP/EP/BROE
Sejin Heavy Industries12.71x2.82x22.18%
HD Hyundai Marine Engine11.20x3.78x33.77%
SK Oceanplant21.99x1.02x4.64%

Within the peer set, Oriental Precision & Engineering sits at the lowest multiple, with a P/E of 13.4x and a P/B of 2.05x. Its ROE of 15.3% is lower than Sejin Heavy Industries (22.2%) and HD Hyundai Marine Engine (33.8%) but clearly higher than SK Oceanplant (4.6%), so its multiple looks suppressed relative to profitability. That said, last year's trailing P/E is a figure with 2025 net profit down 26.5% (including the 2024 base effect), so in an earnings-inflection zone it can look more expensive than it really is, and on a forward basis reflecting this year's Q1 revenue recovery (+10.6%) the burden falls further. Taking into account that suppliers riding the same shipbuilding upturn generally carry higher multiples, we see it as undervalued. However, if margin softening and customer concentration work together, this discount could be justified, so it is best read conditionally rather than concluding flatly that it is cheap.

₩4,305 -0.58%
Market cap $130.0M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩4,305 and the market capitalization is ₩196.2 billion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩5,042) and below its 60-day moving average (₩6,294). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 31.8, a neutral level. The one-month change is -17.7%, the three-month change is -32.2%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -65.7%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 49 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 48% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 13.0%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

49Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 52% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -12.97% / 6M -34.64% / 12M -21.79%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)10.25x
P/B1.57x
P/S0.94x
EPS₩420
BPS (book value/share)₩2,751
Dividend yield
DPS

The P/E of 10.25x is below the sector median (14.44x). The P/B of 1.57x is in line with the sector median (1.44x).

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt$14.8M
EV (enterprise value)$158.8M
EV/EBIT9.87x
EV/Sales1.16x
FCF (free cash flow)$12.4M
FCF yield8.64%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Intrinsic value (DCF estimate)

Bear case₩3,440
Base case₩5,140
Bull case₩8,480

DCF (discounted cash flow) estimate — discount rate 10.1%, initial growth 4.0%→terminal 2.0%, 10-yr forecast, free-cash-flow basis. A reference range that shifts materially with assumptions.

Profitability & financials

ROE15.27%
Operating margin11.71%
Net margin9.24%
Debt ratio189.79%
Payout ratio

Return on equity (ROE) is 15.3%, above the sector average (5.0%). The operating margin is 11.7%. The debt ratio is 189.8%, so the financial structure is moderate.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$104.4M$137.4M$137.4M-0.02% ↓ slower
Operating profit$8.5M$16.5M$16.1M-2.37% ↓ slower
Net profit$5.9M$17.3M$12.7M-26.53% ↓ slower
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$76.8M$87.2M$104.4M$137.4M$137.4M
Operating profit$4.4M$6.1M$8.5M$16.5M$16.1M
Net profit$3.0M$5.5M$5.9M$17.3M$12.7M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg 15.63%

Revenue fell 0.0% year over year (2023 ₩157.5 billion → 2024 ₩207.3 billion → 2025 ₩207.3 billion), and the three-year trend is 'mixed'. The rate of decline widened from the prior year. Operating profit fell 2.4% year over year. The decline widened. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 15.6%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 14.7%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 10.6% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$37.4M
Revenue YoY+10.59%
Operating profit$5.3M
Op. profit YoY-2.64%
Net profit$4.1M
Net profit YoY-10.94%

Technical indicators

RSI (14)31.8
MA20₩5,042
MA60₩6,294
1-month-17.69%
3-month-32.20%
vs 52-wk high-65.67%

What stands out

  • P/E and P/B are both low versus peers, so the price looks inexpensive relative to earnings and assets.
  • ROE of 15.3% points to solid profitability.

Points to watch

  • Revenue fell 0.0% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
2025 revenue₩207,255,774,2132025Confirmedlink
Q1 2026 revenue₩56,445,903,8922026 1Confirmedlink
2026 annual net profit (estimate)approx. ₩23.8 billionUnverifiedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.