Korea Land Trust is a real-estate trust company that takes land and buildings into trust and handles development, sales, and management on the owner's behalf for a fee; its business splits into the lending type, in which the company itself lends the project funds, the completion-guarantee type, which guarantees completion, and the management type, which handles management only, with revenue coming from trust fees and interest income on loans. On March 27 it voluntarily disclosed a corporate value-up plan while its P/B had fallen to about one-third of net assets, and along with a change of CEO it confirmed a swing to net profit and a recovery in Q1 revenue and earnings, while in May it broadened market communication through an IR and a governance report. What stands out lately is that a P/B of 0.27x, a dividend yield in the 6% range, a payout ratio of 72.9%, the swing to net profit, and the value-up plan all point the same way, with a forward P/E on expected earnings around 6x, whereas given the nature of the business, if delinquencies at unsold project sites flow into the P&L as credit losses and provisioning burdens grow, the pace of the earnings recovery can slow, making the recovery of the real-estate development cycle the swing factor.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthModerate
  • For financial companies, debt and interest costs are large by the nature of the business, so the debt ratio and interest coverage cannot be read on the same yardstick as an ordinary company.
GrowthDeclining
  • Revenue fell 22.0% year over year (3-year trend: falling).
  • Net profit swung from a loss a year earlier back into the black (a turnaround).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 17.3% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityModerate
  • ROE is 2.0% (controlling-interest basis). It is below the sector average.
  • Operating margin is -11.3%.
ValuationUndervalued
  • P/B is low versus peers too, so it looks cheap on an asset basis as well.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder MK Investment 24.25% (corporate)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 35.46%

With the controlling bloc holding 35%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Korea Land Trust is a real-estate trust company that takes real estate into trust from land and building owners and handles development, sales, and management on their behalf for a fee.
  • Its core business is land trust, which splits into the lending (development) type, in which the company itself lends project funds and takes responsibility through construction and sales; the completion-guarantee type, which guarantees the builder's completion; and the management type, which handles project management without providing funds.
  • Revenue therefore splits into two main streams: trust fees received for operating trust projects, and interest income on money lent to lending-type project sites.
  • When the property market is strong, sale proceeds come in well and profits grow, while unsold units or project-site distress bring the risk of not recovering lent money (credit losses) into the P&L.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩1,103 and the market cap is ₩278.5 billion.
  • The price sits below the 20-day line (₩1,160) and below the 60-day line (₩1,341).
  • Trading below both its short- and medium-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (a supplementary gauge that weighs upward versus downward momentum over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 38.0, a neutral level.
  • The one-month change is -7.1%, the three-month change is -25.8%, and the position versus the 52-week high is -36.8%.
  • Relative strength versus the KOSPI is 19 (1-99, converting the past year's return versus the index with heavier weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it in roughly the top 82% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it has lagged the index by 41.9%.
  • Chart readings are best viewed together with trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • On confirmed annual results (2025), the P/E ratio (how many times one year's earnings the share price represents) is 13.27x, the P/B (how many times net assets the share price represents) is 0.27x, and ROE (how much is earned in a year on equity) is 2.0%.
  • A P/B of 0.27x means the share price is less than one-third of the company's net assets, so even on asset value alone the price is set low.
  • One point to note is the mismatch between a 2025 operating loss of ₩20.9 billion and a net profit of ₩21.0 billion.
  • In real-estate trust, credit-loss provisions on distressed project sites can weigh heavily on the operating line, while provision reversals or non-operating items can lift net profit, so a single year's operating margin alone makes it hard to judge the company's strength.
  • More important is the forward P/E on this year's expected earnings.
  • This forward P/E is low versus the same real-estate-trust sector, meaning that at an inflection where earnings recover out of a loss-making operating line, a forward-looking P/E is closer to reality than backward-looking figures.
  • The debt ratio of 191.8% mixes financial-industry characteristics such as trust-account borrowings, making it hard to judge by the same yardstick as ordinary manufacturers.
🚀Growth
  • Annual revenue fell for two straight years, from ₩270.1 billion in 2023 to ₩236.3 billion in 2024 and ₩184.4 billion in 2025.
  • Operating profit swung from a ₩33.9 billion profit in 2024 to a ₩20.9 billion loss in 2025, largely due to distress at lending-type project sites being booked as provisions.
  • Conversely, net profit swung from losses in 2023 and 2024 to a ₩21.0 billion profit in 2025.
  • The dividing point in the trend is the most recent quarter, Q1 2026.
  • Revenue rose 17.3% year on year to ₩43.7 billion and net profit rose 17.1% to ₩9.9 billion, turning a shrinking top line back toward growth.
  • Operating profit also climbed out of the red to a ₩500 million profit.
  • The forward P/E on this year's expected earnings falling to around 6x reflects precisely this recovery: with revenue growing again and net profit taking hold, this year's earnings are seen as firmer than last year's confirmed figures.
  • Underpinning this is the effect of the real-estate development cycle turning off the bottom, so sales and trust demand revive, and the provisioning burden that had deepened the loss having been cleared once.
  • That said, Q1 operating profit is still only a slight profit, so whether this recovery firms up over successive quarters is an area to confirm in subsequent results.
📰Recent news & filings
  • At the center of the disclosure flow is the March 27, 2026 voluntary disclosure of a corporate value-up plan.
  • It matters that a company whose P/B has fallen to about one-third of net assets set out on its own a direction for shareholder returns and capital-efficiency improvement, and whether the plan leads to actions such as dividends or share buybacks can be checked in follow-up disclosures.
  • Also in March, a change of CEO and the results of the shareholders' meeting were disclosed, marking a fresh start for management, and the March 18 business report and the May 15 quarterly report confirm the results above.
  • In May, an IR announcement and a governance report followed, showing a trend of the company increasing communication with the market.
🧭Bottom line
  • This company is an undervalued stock with clear strengths.
  • A price at one-third of net assets (a P/B of 0.27x), a dividend yield in the 6% range and a payout ratio of 72.9%, the swing to net profit, revenue and earnings that grew again in Q1, and the corporate value-up plan the company itself put forward all point the same way.
  • The forward P/E on this year's expected earnings at around 6x, low versus the same real-estate-trust sector, shows the price is set low not only on asset value but also from an earnings standpoint.
  • Because the nature of the business brings property conditions and distress at unsold project sites into the P&L as credit losses, it is strong when the development cycle revives, the Q1 top-line recovery takes hold as an operating profit over successive quarters, and the value-up plan is executed as actual returns.
  • Conversely, if project-site distress flares up again and the provisioning burden grows, the pace of the earnings recovery can slow.
  • In the end, whether the recovery of the real-estate development cycle continues is the axis that separates this stock's strength from its weakness.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Inconclusive

Rather than a simple industry code, the peer group was set as listed companies whose actual business is real-estate trust, prioritizing Korea Asset Trust as the directly comparable dedicated real-estate-trust firm among Korea's listed players.

PeerP/EP/BROE
Korea Asset In Trust5.43x0.25x4.56%

Versus the peer Korea Asset Trust, the P/B (0.30x vs 0.26x) is similar and ROE (2.0% vs 4.6%) is lower. The P/E looks spread apart at 15.05x for Korea Land Trust versus 5.69x for Korea Asset Trust, but Korea Land Trust had a net profit amid a 2025 operating loss, so the quality of earnings differs and a simple multiple comparison is difficult. In real-estate trust, the recoverability of held assets and project-site receivables drives value, so the net-asset (P/B) view is more valid, and both companies trade at around 30% of net assets. The confirmed trailing P/E from last year is based on past earnings, and this year an official company forecast is not confirmed, so it can only be gauged from a DART seasonality approximation. Since it is before confirming whether earnings firm up out of the loss-making operating line, it is hard to conclude 'cheap or expensive,' so we regard it as inconclusive.

Earnings outlook company-stated · verified

TypePeriodRevenueOperating profitNet profit
Next quarterQ2 2026approx. ₩42.2 billionapprox. ₩0.8 billion
₩1,103 -2.73%
Market cap $184.6M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩1,103 and the market capitalization is ₩278.5 billion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩1,160) and below its 60-day moving average (₩1,341). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 38.0, a neutral level. The one-month change is -7.1%, the three-month change is -25.8%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -36.8%. Relative strength versus the KOSPI is 19 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 18% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 41.9%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

19Relative strength vs KOSPI1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 82% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -41.94% / 6M -43.71% / 12M -62.59%

StockKOSPI

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)13.27x
P/B0.27x
P/S1.51x
EPS₩83
BPS (book value/share)₩4,112
Dividend yield6.35%
DPS₩70

The P/E of 13.27x is in line with the sector median (12.68x). The P/B of 0.27x is below the sector median (0.66x).

Profitability & financials

ROE2.02%
Operating margin-11.33%
Net margin11.37%
Debt ratio191.76%
Payout ratio72.90%

Return on equity (ROE) is 2.0%, below the sector average (6.0%). The operating margin is -11.3%. The debt ratio is 191.8%, but for financial firms deposits and insurance liabilities count as debt, so it cannot be read on the same yardstick as an ordinary company.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$179.0M$156.6M$122.2M-21.99% ↓ slower
Operating profit$20.7M$22.5M-$13.8M-161.51% ↓ slower
Net profit-$5.6M-$10.9M$13.9M
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$179.0M$156.6M$122.2M
Operating profit$20.7M$22.5M-$13.8M
Net profit-$5.6M-$10.9M$13.9M
Revenue CAGR2-yr avg -17.38%

Revenue fell 22.0% year over year (2023 ₩270.1 billion → 2024 ₩236.3 billion → 2025 ₩184.4 billion), and the three-year trend is 'falling'. The rate of decline widened from the prior year. Operating profit fell 161.5% year over year. The decline widened. Over the 3 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is -17.4%. The two-year revenue CAGR is -17.4%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 17.3% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$29.0M
Revenue YoY+17.32%
Operating profit$317,191
Op. profit YoY
Net profit$6.6M
Net profit YoY+17.10%

Technical indicators

RSI (14)38.0
MA20₩1,160
MA60₩1,341
1-month-7.08%
3-month-25.77%
vs 52-wk high-36.75%

What stands out

  • P/E and P/B are both low versus peers, so the price looks inexpensive relative to earnings and assets.
  • The dividend yield, at 6.3%, is on the high side.

Points to watch

  • Revenue fell 22.0% year over year (3-year trend: falling).

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
Confirmed annual P/E15.05xUnverifiedlink
Q1 2026 revenue growth rate+17.3%Unverifiedlink
P/B0.30xUnverifiedlink
Seasonality-approximated annual operating profitapprox. ₩2.2 billionUnverifiedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.