Chips&Media does not make chips itself; instead it licenses video-codec IP -- designs that compress and decompress video -- to system-semiconductor design companies. It earns a license fee when a customer takes the IP and a royalty each time a chip containing that IP is sold, and it has recently been broadening its IP into AI video processing (NPU) and camera image processing (ISP). In 2026 it announced a corporate-value-enhancement plan on March 25, followed by IR and preliminary Q1 results in April and a quarterly report on May 15; in Q1 revenue rose while operating profit fell on off-season effects, and the dividend payout ratio is 40.2%. What stands out lately is that, thanks to a model of licensing IP with no production or inventory, the operating margin holds at 24.5%, 2025 operating profit rose 31.9%, the balance sheet is firm with a current ratio of 1,023%, and it occupies the rare position of being profitable. On the other hand, royalties trail customers' chip shipments by a one-to-two-year lag, so quarterly results swing, and volatility grows if the pace of new IP adoption is slow.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthStable
  • Debt ratio, current ratio and interest burden all look healthy.
GrowthStagnant
  • Revenue rose 5.1% year over year, and the pace is quickening (3-year trend: mixed).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 7.6% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityModerate
  • ROE is 7.0% (total-net basis). It is above the sector average.
  • Operating margin is 24.5%.
ValuationOvervalued
  • The P/E sits above the sector median, reflecting elevated expectations.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Korea Investment Semiconductor Investment 31.26% (corporate)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 34.24%

With the controlling bloc holding 34%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Chips&Media does not make chips itself; it licenses 'video-codec IP' (intellectual property, like a semiconductor design blueprint) that compresses and decompresses video to system-on-chip (SoC) design companies.
  • Money comes in through two channels.
  • The first is a one-time license fee when a customer takes the IP; the second is a royalty received in proportion to unit volume each time a chip containing that IP is actually sold.
  • Recently, on top of existing video codecs (H.264, HEVC, AV1), it has been broadening its IP types into AI video processing (NPU) and camera image processing (ISP).
  • Because there is no in-house production or inventory, the operating margin holds high at 24.5%, and once an IP is adopted, royalties keep flowing for as long as the customer's chip sells -- the core strength of the business.
  • That said, because royalties trail the customer's chip-shipment flow by a one-to-two-year lag, results swinging quarter to quarter should be seen as a natural characteristic.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩11,900 and the market cap is ₩254.1 billion.
  • The price sits below the 20-day line (₩12,961) and below the 60-day line (₩15,638).
  • Trading under both the short- and medium-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (an indicator that gauges the balance of upward versus downward momentum over the last 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 42.5, a neutral level.
  • The 1-month change is -10.5%, the 3-month change is -22.0%, and the price stands -40.0% below its 52-week high.
  • Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 56 (on a 1-99 scale that converts return relative to the index over the past year, weighting recent performance more heavily; higher means stronger than the market), placing it in roughly the top 44% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it outpaced the index by 1.2%.
  • Chart readings are best considered alongside trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • On last year's confirmed results, the P/E ratio (how many times one year's net profit the price represents) is 42.91x and the P/B (how many times net assets the price represents) is 3.01x.
  • The reason this P/E looks high is that 2025 net profit fell from the prior year, shrinking the denominator (profit), so it is hard to call the stock 'expensive' from last year's figure alone.
  • For such an earnings-inflection stock, the real picture is the forward P/E based on this year's expected earnings, and that value is distinctly lower than last year's confirmed multiple.
  • Profitability is high, with an operating margin of 24.5% and a net margin of 20.8%, and ROE (how much is earned on equity in a year) of 7.0% is ahead of peers, many of which run losses (average -3.0%).
  • The balance sheet is firm too: the debt ratio is 125.8%, but the current ratio is 1,023%, so short-term liquidity is ample, and interest coverage of 41x means the debt burden is light.
🚀Growth
  • Over the multi-year trend, revenue rose to ₩28.5 billion, up +5.1% from the prior year, with the pace of increase quickening, and operating profit recovered +31.9% to ₩7.0 billion.
  • That means the core business is regaining momentum.
  • The -40.8% drop in 2025 net profit was not because the business worsened but largely because 2024 net profit included non-operating items, raising the comparison base.
  • Importantly, the core-business metrics -- revenue and operating profit -- rose together.
  • The most recent quarter (Q1 2026) also grew, with revenue of ₩5.8 billion (+7.6%), and the decline in operating profit should be viewed together with the fact that Q1 is a seasonal off-season.
  • Behind the forward P/E coming down on this year's earnings basis is a flow in which once-adopted codec, AI, and ISP IP accumulates as royalties in line with customers' chip shipments, and the license base thickens as the new IP lineup broadens.
  • Because there is no in-house production, more revenue drops through well to profit, so if this improvement continues, this year's earnings are naturally supported.
📰Recent news & filings
  • The official disclosure flow has two axes: earnings and shareholder returns.
  • On March 25, 2026, the company itself announced a corporate-value-enhancement plan (voluntary disclosure) setting out its direction for enhancing shareholder value; this was followed by an IR on April 23, a fair disclosure of preliminary Q1 results on April 28, and a quarterly report on May 15 that disclosed the confirmed figures.
  • The preliminary Q1 results showed revenue up while operating profit fell on off-season effects, and the value-enhancement plan should be read together with a context in which a certain level of shareholder return -- a 40.2% payout ratio -- is already in place.
  • This summary is based on the official source documents and the company IR, not general news.
🧭Bottom line
  • The strengths are clear.
  • Thanks to a model of licensing IP with no in-house production or inventory, the operating margin holds steadily at 24.5%, and 2025 operating profit rose +31.9%, showing the core business accelerating again.
  • The balance sheet is firm too, with a current ratio of 1,023% and interest coverage of 41x.
  • On valuation, even though last year's confirmed P/E looks high, the forward P/E on this year's earnings comes down, and against direct peers (IP and design companies) -- many of which are loss-making so P/E comparison is not even possible -- its position as a rare profitable company stands out.
  • The price too is in a zone where expectations have cooled, down -31.5% over six months and -40.2% from its 52-week high.
  • A point to watch is that, by the nature of the business, royalties trail customers' chip shipments with a lag, so quarterly results swing.
  • In sum, the more new IP adoption and customer chip shipments continue and royalties accumulate, the stronger both earnings and valuation appeal become; conversely, if the pace of new adoption is slow, the structure is one of larger quarter-to-quarter swings.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Inconclusive

Centered on listed Korean companies that, rather than making chips themselves, license design IP or provide design services, choosing those closest to the video-IP business reality. All on-site figures use the same formula as the base.

PeerP/EP/BROE
Openedges Technology16.87x-176.53%
Gaonchips12.04x-26.27%
Hana Materials26.13x2.16x8.28%

The direct peers (Openedges and Gaonchips) are loss-making, so their P/Es are blank and only their P/Bs are high in the double digits. That is, this video and design IP area itself is one that pre-reflects future-growth expectations, so the profitable Chips&Media's P/B of 3.7x can even be read as a discount to peers. Conversely, against a profitable mid-cap semiconductor company (Hana Materials), its P/E of 52.7x is a premium. However, this 52.7x is on a trailing (last-year confirmed) basis in which 2025 net profit fell -40.8% and shrank the denominator, so it is overstated at the inflection point. Operating profit rose +31.9%, and forward revenue and operating profit seen only through a DART seasonality approximation are about ₩28.7 billion and ₩2.3 billion respectively, so the core business is improving. With peers at varying earnings stages and no company guidance figures, the verdict is left Inconclusive rather than a firm undervalued or overvalued call.

Earnings outlook company-stated · verified

TypePeriodRevenueOperating profitNet profit
Next quarterQ2 2026approx. ₩6.7 billionapprox. ₩0.4 billionapprox. ₩2.0 billion
₩11,900 +6.34%
Market cap $168.4M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩11,900 and the market capitalization is ₩254.1 billion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩12,961) and below its 60-day moving average (₩15,638). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 42.5, a neutral level. The one-month change is -10.5%, the three-month change is -22.0%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -40.0%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 56 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 56% of all stocks. Over the past three months it outpaced the index by 1.2%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

56Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 44% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M +1.20% / 6M -24.27% / 12M -31.03%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)42.91x
P/B3.01x
P/S8.90x
EPS₩277
BPS (book value/share)₩3,957
Dividend yield0.97%
DPS₩116

The P/E of 42.91x is above the sector median (27.09x). The P/B of 3.01x is above the sector median (2.10x).

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt$1.8M
EV (enterprise value)$206.5M
EV/EBIT44.73x
EV/Sales10.94x
FCF (free cash flow)$1.5M
FCF yield0.75%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Profitability & financials

ROE7.01%
Operating margin24.46%
Net margin20.80%
Debt ratio125.79%
Payout ratio40.18%

The operating margin is 24.5%. The debt ratio is 125.8%, so the financial structure is moderate.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$18.3M$17.9M$18.9M+5.14% ↑ faster
Operating profit$5.2M$3.5M$4.6M+31.87% ↑ faster
Net profit-$17.7M$6.6M$3.9M-40.83%
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$13.2M$16.0M$18.3M$17.9M$18.9M
Operating profit$3.4M$4.8M$5.2M$3.5M$4.6M
Net profit$4.2M$6.6M-$17.7M$6.6M$3.9M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg 9.25%

Revenue rose 5.1% year over year (2023 ₩27.6 billion → 2024 ₩27.1 billion → 2025 ₩28.5 billion), and the three-year trend is 'mixed'. The pace of growth also quickened from the prior year. Operating profit rose 31.9% year over year. Profit is growing at an accelerating pace. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 9.2%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 1.6%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 7.6% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$3.8M
Revenue YoY+7.64%
Operating profit$119,649
Op. profit YoY-11.12%
Net profit$857,614
Net profit YoY

Technical indicators

RSI (14)42.5
MA20₩12,961
MA60₩15,638
1-month-10.53%
3-month-22.02%
vs 52-wk high-39.96%

What stands out

  • The balance sheet is stable in terms of debt and liquidity.

Points to watch

  • The price is high versus peers, so expectations already appear priced in.

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
FY2025 operating profit₩7.0 billion (+31.9% YoY)₩7.0 billionConfirmedlink
FY2025 net profit₩5.9 billion (-40.8% YoY)₩5.9 billionConfirmedlink
Q1 2026 revenue₩5.8 billion (+7.6% YoY)₩5.8 billionConfirmedlink
2026 full-year seasonality-approximated operating profitapprox. ₩2.3 billionUnverifiedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.