Hugel makes the botulinum toxin 'Letybo' that smooths glabellar lines and other wrinkles, along with hyaluronic-acid fillers, cosmetics, and medical devices; toxin and filler are the core of revenue, and as the only Korean company holding sales approvals across all three major aesthetics markets — the United States, Europe, and China — Letybo, which received FDA approval in 2024, has become a new growth axis with full-scale U.S. sales from 2025. On May 6, 2026 the company issued a clarifying filing on reports that its largest shareholder was reviewing a governance restructuring, including a domestic delisting, stating it was 'under review but nothing has been decided,' and on May 7 its Q1 preliminary results showed both revenue and profit growing at double digits. What stands out recently is a set of strengths — a rare position holding approvals in all three markets, an operating margin in the 47% range, almost no debt, and growth that has accelerated around U.S. Letybo so that this year's profit rises roughly 30% and the multiple comes down — against the cautions that toxin and filler can be swayed by the aesthetics cycle, exchange rates, and export-market regulation, and the direction of the largest shareholder's governance restructuring is still undecided.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthStable
  • Debt ratio, current ratio and interest burden all look healthy.
GrowthGrowing
  • Revenue rose 14.0% year over year, and the pace is slowing (3-year trend: rising).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 29.9% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityHealthy
  • ROE is 14.8% (controlling-interest basis). It is above the sector average.
  • Operating margin is 47.2%.
ValuationOvervalued
  • The forward P/E sits above the sector median, reflecting elevated expectations.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Aphrodite Acquisition Holdings 43.53% (individual)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 43.53%

With the controlling bloc holding 44%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • Hugel makes and sells the botulinum toxin (an aesthetic injectable commonly called 'Botox') 'Letybo' that smooths glabellar lines and other wrinkles, along with hyaluronic-acid fillers, plus cosmetics and medical devices.
  • The core of revenue is toxin and filler; it holds a top share of the domestic procedure market while its export share is rapidly growing.
  • In particular, as the only Korean company holding sales approvals across all three of the world's major aesthetics markets — the United States, Europe, and China — Letybo, which received U.S.
  • FDA approval in 2024, has become a new growth axis with full-scale U.S. sales from 2025.
  • It supplies Europe through a partner and China through its own and local channels.
  • In sum, 'stable cash flow from domestic toxin and filler + expanding exports to the U.S., China, and Europe' is how this company earns money.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩236,000 and the market cap is ₩2.9 trillion.
  • The price sits below its 20-day line (₩252,550) and its 60-day line (₩258,092).
  • Trading below both its short- and mid-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (an auxiliary gauge that measures the strength of gains against losses over the past 14 days on a 0–100 scale) is 42.4, a neutral level.
  • The price is down 1.5% over one month and down 1.9% over three months, and stands 39.2% below its 52-week high.
  • Its relative strength versus KOSDAQ is 72 (on a 1–99 scale, converted from return relative to the index over the past year with heavier weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it in roughly the top 28% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it led the index by 30.4%.
  • Chart reading is best done alongside trading volume and the dates when filings occur.
📊Key metrics
  • Starting with the valuation metrics, the P/E ratio (how many times one year's net profit the share price represents) is 20.61x and the P/B (how many times book net assets) is 3.06x.
  • Profitability is notably good: an operating margin of 47.2% (₩47 of operating profit per ₩100 of revenue) and an ROE (how much it earns in a year on shareholders' equity) of 14.8%, above the peer average.
  • The balance sheet is very solid: the debt ratio (debt against capital) is 113%, but the current ratio (assets usable now against debt due within a year) reaches 730% and interest coverage is 21x, so the debt burden is almost nil.
  • Here, the P/E of 23.98x is a value calculated on last year's (2025) confirmed earnings (trailing); with this year's profit growing at double digits, on a forward earnings basis the multiple comes down below this — a point to view alongside.
🚀Growth
  • Revenue grew from ₩231.9 billion in 2021 to ₩425.1 billion in 2025, about 16% average annual growth over five years, with operating profit (₩95.6 billion → ₩200.9 billion) and net profit (₩57.7 billion → ₩140.9 billion) rising alongside.
  • In 2025 revenue grew 14.0% and operating profit 20.8%, and in Q1 2026 revenue rose 29.9%, operating profit 22.3%, and net profit 31.5% — with growth actually accelerating.
  • The key engine of this acceleration is U.S.
  • Letybo sales, which began in earnest in 2025, plus expanding exports to China and Europe.
  • This year typically layers in the H2 effect of U.S. sales growing further through the year, so rather than simply extending the trend of Q1 net profit of ₩40.6 billion, it is right to view it on an annual trajectory as export volume builds.
  • Reflecting this trend, this year's net profit looks set to rise distinctly above last year's (₩140.9 billion), in which case the forward earnings-based P/E falls to the low 19x range.
  • In other words, the 24x calculated on last year's earnings somewhat overstates the real picture of a company whose profit is growing quickly.
📰Recent news & filings
  • The most notable filing is the May 6, 2026 'clarification on a rumor or report.' Regarding foreign-press reports that the largest shareholder (Aphrodite Acquisition Holdings, in which CBC Group and others participate) was reviewing a governance restructuring, including a domestic delisting, the company officially confirmed that 'the largest shareholder is reviewing various strategic options, but nothing has been decided to date.' Then, on May 7, a Q1 preliminary-results (consolidated operating-results) fair disclosure showed both revenue and profit growing at double digits, followed by filings for an extraordinary shareholder meeting, a stock-option grant, and an IR session.
  • The governance review is still 'undecided,' so whether an actual decision is made and on what terms is a matter to keep confirming.
🧭Bottom line
  • The strengths are clear: a rare position as the only Korean toxin-and-filler company holding approvals across all three major markets — the U.S., Europe, and China — high profitability with an operating margin in the 47% range, a balance sheet with almost no debt burden, and growth that has reaccelerated around U.S.
  • Letybo.
  • The P/E calculated on last year's earnings looks high, but the key is that with this year's profit rising roughly 30%, on a forward earnings basis the multiple comes down.
  • There are two cautions.
  • First, toxin and filler results can be swayed by the aesthetic-procedure cycle, exchange rates, and export-market regulation and marketing performance.
  • Second, reports of the largest shareholder's governance restructuring (including a delisting review) are not yet confirmed, so depending on the direction they could act as a variable for minority shareholders.
  • Taken together, if export expansion proceeds as planned, both growth and valuation are favorable, while it could waver if the aesthetics cycle slows or governance uncertainty grows.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Fairly valued

Actual domestic aesthetics peer set (toxin, filler, aesthetic devices) — PharmaResearch (filler and regeneration), Classys (aesthetic medical devices), and Daewoong Pharmaceutical (holder of the Nabota toxin, a diversified pharmaceutical company).

PeerP/EP/BROE
Pharma Research19.44x4.66x23.95%
Classys24.77x5.91x23.86%
Daewoong Pharmaceutical7.79x1.52x19.47%

Hugel's trailing P/E of 23.98x is essentially the same level as pure aesthetics peers PharmaResearch (23.1x) and Classys (23.7x). Its P/B, however, is 3.55x — actually lower than the two peers (5.5–5.7x). The P/E calculated on last year's earnings looking high is a characteristic of an inflection phase where profit is growing quickly, and reflecting this year's earnings (Q1 net profit +31.5%, expanding U.S. exports) brings the forward earnings-based P/E down to the low 19x range. In that case the premium over aesthetics peers with similar growth and profitability is not large, and on a P/B basis there is even a discount element. Daewoong Pharmaceutical (7.0x) holds the Nabota toxin but its business is diversified across general pharmaceuticals, making a direct comparison with pure aesthetics valuation difficult. In sum, it is judged 'fairly valued,' with the outcome of the governance review potentially acting as a separate variable for the valuation.

₩236,000 -1.46%
Market cap $1.9B

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩236,000 and the market capitalization is ₩2.9 trillion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩252,550) and below its 60-day moving average (₩258,092). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 42.4, a neutral level. The one-month change is -1.5%, the three-month change is -1.9%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -39.2%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 72 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 72% of all stocks. Over the past three months it outpaced the index by 30.4%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

72Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 28% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M +30.36% / 6M +25.17% / 12M -37.45%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)20.61x
Forward P/E16.59x
P/B3.06x
Forward P/B2.88x
P/S6.83x
EPS₩11,449
BPS (book value/share)₩77,232
Dividend yield
DPS

The P/E of 20.61x is above the sector median (15.98x). The P/B of 3.06x is above the sector median (1.37x).

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt-$121.9M
EV (enterprise value)$2.1B
EV/EBIT15.62x
EV/EBITDA14.07x
EV/Sales7.38x
FCF (free cash flow)$79.9M
FCF yield3.63%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Intrinsic value (DCF estimate)

Bear case₩142,100
Base case₩191,400
Bull case₩279,200

DCF (discounted cash flow) estimate — discount rate 11.6%, initial growth 10.0%→terminal 2.0%, 10-yr forecast, free-cash-flow basis, forward earnings power normalized 1.242x. A reference range that shifts materially with assumptions.

Profitability & financials

ROE14.82%
Operating margin47.25%
Net margin33.14%
Debt ratio113.32%
Payout ratio

Return on equity (ROE) is 14.8%, above the sector average (3.0%). The operating margin is 47.2%. The debt ratio is 113.3%, so the financial structure is moderate.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$211.9M$247.2M$281.8M+13.96% ↓ slower
Operating profit$78.1M$110.2M$133.1M+20.83% ↓ slower
Net profit$61.7M$90.0M$93.4M+3.72% ↓ slower
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$153.7M$186.7M$211.9M$247.2M$281.8M
Operating profit$63.4M$67.2M$78.1M$110.2M$133.1M
Net profit$38.3M$38.0M$61.7M$90.0M$93.4M
Revenue CAGR4-yr avg 16.36%

Revenue rose 14.0% year over year (2023 ₩319.7 billion → 2024 ₩373.0 billion → 2025 ₩425.1 billion), and the three-year trend is 'rising'. That said, the pace of growth slowed from the prior year. Operating profit rose 20.8% year over year. The pace of that profit growth is gradually easing. Over the 5 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 16.4%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 15.3%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 29.9% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$77.3M
Revenue YoY+29.86%
Operating profit$31.6M
Op. profit YoY+22.26%
Net profit$26.9M
Net profit YoY+31.47%

Technical indicators

RSI (14)42.4
MA20₩252,550
MA60₩258,092
1-month-1.46%
3-month-1.87%
vs 52-wk high-39.18%

What stands out

  • ROE of 14.8% points to solid profitability.
  • Revenue grew 14.0% year over year, a sign of growth.
  • The balance sheet is stable in terms of debt and liquidity.

Points to watch

  • The price is high versus peers, so expectations already appear priced in.

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
Q1 2026 net profit growth (YoY)+31.5%1Confirmedlink
Whether a governance restructuring (delisting, etc.) is under review' 'Confirmedlink
Forward P/E based on this year's estimated net profitapprox. 19.3x(self-estimate)Unverifiedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.