← Stocks 한국어 ↗

Cellbion (308430) 🔎 In-depth

KOSDAQ · Price as of 2026-08-06 · Updated 2026-08-09

Compiled and reviewed by Bing Bing · Figures are computed automatically from public filings and market data; the written analysis is drafted automatically and then rule-verified · Methodology · AI Disclosure · Report an error

Cellbion develops radiopharmaceuticals that treat cancer by delivering radioactive isotopes precisely to tumor cells. Its lead candidate is '177Lu-focuvotide,' a targeted therapy aimed at advanced prostate cancer; the company is still at the pre-commercial stage, so annual revenue is small at about ₩1.9 billion and mostly research- and technology-related, which means its value rests on the approval and launch of the drug under development. In March 2026 it decided on a new investment of about ₩3.02 billion in a GMP radiopharmaceutical production facility, beginning to lay the groundwork for commercialization, and in April it secured funding by issuing third-party allotment convertible preferred stock (about ₩25.0 billion) and a third series of convertible bonds (₩25.0 billion, 0% coupon) in quick succession. The points worth watching now: a differentiated pipeline in targeted radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer, domestic approval work paired with an in-house production facility, secured commercialization funding, and a stock that has fallen more than 60% from its 52-week high are strengths, while the fact that it is still pre-profit means a delayed or off-track drug approval would weaken the basis for its value, and conversion of the preferred stock and bonds into common shares would bring dilution alongside it.

This page organises public market and filing data for information purposes. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell, nor investment advice. Metrics labelled “forward” are our own unverified estimates. Please verify with the original DART filings and decide at your own responsibility.

30-second brief

Earnings trend
revenue and profit declined.
Financials
financial metrics are around average.
Data as of
prices as of 2026-08-06, financials as of 2026 1분기.

Pulled directly from the computed values below — not a separately written opinion.

What do the SourceComputedEstimateReading tags mean?

Source filings and exchange data · Computed calculated from public data · Estimate our own unverified projection · Reading drafted automatically, then rule-checked. See AI & Automation.

Core valuation metric

Pipeline value (qualitative)

This stock's effective sub-sector is “Biotech (Drug Development & Research)” (Biotech & Pharmaceuticals), a type best read first through qualitative factors such as pipeline value and cash runway rather than earnings multiples.

Drug-discovery biotech firms often have little in the way of earnings or revenue yet, so P/E or sales multiples can't meaningfully capture their value. Instead, it makes more sense to judge them qualitatively — by the clinical stage of the pipeline, licensing and out-licensing progress, and the cash runway that keeps research going.

That said, meaningful revenue has yet to ramp, so pipeline value and cash runway may matter more than this metric.

This note explains how each sector is typically valued and is educational context only, not investment advice.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthModerate
  • The most recent full-year net result was a loss.
GrowthDeclining
  • Revenue fell 15.0% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 27.7% higher than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityLoss-making
  • ROE is -33.2% (total-net basis). It is below the sector average.
  • Operating margin is -423.9%.
ValuationInconclusive
  • A sector-metric and in-depth research verdict — see “Valuation vs peers” below for the basis.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Kim Kwon 30.23% (individual)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 36.41%

With the controlling bloc holding 36%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis Reading

🏢Business

Cellbion develops 'radiopharmaceuticals' that treat cancer by delivering radioactive isotopes precisely to tumor cells. Its lead candidate is '177Lu-focuvotide,' a targeted therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (advanced prostate cancer that no longer responds well to other treatments). It works by attaching lutetium-177, which emits radiation, to PSMA, a target abundant on the surface of prostate cancer cells, thereby selectively attacking those cells. Still at the pre-commercial stage, annual revenue is small at about ₩1.9 billion, and most of it is research- and technology-related. The company's value therefore rests less on the profit it earns today and more on whether the drug under development wins approval and actually reaches the market.

📈Price & chart

The latest close is ₩13,370 and the market capitalization is ₩172.5 billion. The price sits above its 20-day moving average (₩12,832) and below its 60-day moving average (₩17,588). Short-term and medium-term trends are diverging, so the direction is best read separately. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 46.3, a neutral level. The one-month change is -16.4%, the three-month change is -56.5%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -66.7%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 34 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 34% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 33.8%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

📊Key metrics

This is the financial profile typical of a clinical-stage biotech. Still pre-profit, no P/E (how many years of earnings the price represents) can be computed, and EPS (earnings per share) is -₩587. In 2025 ROE (how much a company earns in a year on its equity) was -33.2% and the operating margin was -423.9%, plainly showing the development-stage trait of R&D and operating costs exceeding revenue. The P/B (how many times net assets the price represents) is 8.39x, but this figure arises because the market is pricing in the future value of the drug pipeline rather than the assets on the books, so it is better read as reflecting what expectations are embedded than simply as 'expensive.' Loss-making biotechs in the same field carry similarly high multiples of net assets for the same reason, making it hard to judge burden from this multiple alone. Meanwhile, a current ratio of 11x means short-term solvency is ample, and the April 2026 financing added further operating capital. The P/S at 117x is large simply because revenue is small in the first place, so for this company clinical and approval progress matter more than revenue or earnings multiples.

🚀Growth

The top line has been uneven. Revenue ran ₩1.47 billion in 2023, ₩2.29 billion in 2024, and ₩1.95 billion in 2025, down 15.0% year on year in 2025, though the three-year average grew about 15%, leaving the trend mixed. In the most recent quarter, Q1 2026 cumulative revenue of ₩0.61 billion was up 27.7% from the same period a year earlier, turning the quarterly momentum back upward. That said, this company's growth engine is not revenue itself but the approval and commercialization of its drug. Still pre-profit, it has no officially stated revenue or profit plan figures for this year, so a forward P/E based on future earnings likewise cannot be meaningfully computed until a swing to profit is confirmed. This is not to disparage the figures but to note that a clinical-stage company's value is more accurately assessed through clinical results and approval progress than through earnings multiples. That the lead candidate targets castration-resistant prostate cancer, an area of large unmet need, and that domestic approval work and facility construction are proceeding together, are the practical yardsticks for gauging its future growth potential.

📰Recent news & filings

Recent disclosures boil down to two threads. First, in March 2026 the company decided on a new investment (about ₩3.02 billion, or 10.1% of shareholders' equity) in a radiopharmaceutical manufacturing facility (GMP production facility), beginning to build the production base for commercialization. Second, in April 2026 it issued third-party allotment convertible preferred stock (about ₩25.0 billion) and a third series of convertible bonds (face value ₩25.0 billion, 0% coupon) in quick succession, securing facility and operating funds, with both issues completed. That the financing thickened the funds available for development and production is a positive, while the dilution that would follow if the preferred stock and convertible bonds later convert into common shares is something to watch alongside it.

🧭Bottom line

Splitting the picture into strengths and cautions makes it clear. The strengths are a differentiated pipeline in targeted radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer, the simultaneous pursuit of domestic approval and an in-house production facility, and commercialization funds secured ahead of time through 2026 financing. Also worth noting is that the stock has fallen more than 60% from its 52-week high, a spot where expectations have cooled considerably. The cautions are that, still being pre-profit, a delayed or off-track drug approval could weaken the basis for its value, and that share count increases when the preferred stock and convertible bonds convert into common shares. In sum, this is a stock strong in phases where approval and commercialization proceed smoothly and weak in phases where the approval timeline slips or funding dilution comes to the fore, with its direction hinging sharply on the outcome.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Inconclusive

Compared against domestic clinical-stage biotechs that are not yet profitable, with FutureChem the closest in business character as it works in the same radiopharmaceutical and PSMA field; since loss-making firms have no usable P/E, position is gauged by P/B (multiple of net assets).

PeerP/EP/BROE
FutureChem0.00x3.75x-20.59%
LigaChem Biosciences0.00x8.87x-18.04%
ABL Bio0.00x25.82x-24.44%

Cellbion's P/B of about 10x is higher than FutureChem's (4.8x), the most similar in business, comparable to LigaChem Biosciences (9.8x), and below ABL Bio (36.7x). All of these are loss-making, however, so a P/E based on last year's confirmed results (past earnings) cannot be used, and it is hard to conclude expensive or cheap from a net-asset multiple alone. The value of such clinical-stage companies ultimately rests on whether drug approval and commercialization succeed, so with current financial metrics alone it is hard to judge fair value, and we leave it inconclusive. If approval proceeds smoothly the current multiple can be justified, while a delay or failure could widen the discount.

₩13,370 -0.74%
Market cap $121.2M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩13,370 and the market capitalization is ₩172.5 billion. The price sits above its 20-day moving average (₩12,832) and below its 60-day moving average (₩17,588). Short-term and medium-term trends are diverging, so the direction is best read separately. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 46.3, a neutral level. The one-month change is -16.4%, the three-month change is -56.5%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -66.7%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 34 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 34% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 33.8%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

34Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 66% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -33.78% / 6M -25.84% / 12M -51.70%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics Computed vs sector median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)
P/B8.39x
P/S88.70x
EPS₩-587
BPS (book value/share)₩1,594
Dividend yield
DPS

A net loss makes the P/E an unreliable valuation gauge. The P/B of 8.39x is above the sector median (1.10x).

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt-$358,815
EV (enterprise value)$120.9M
EV/Sales82.79x
FCF (free cash flow)-$5.1M
FCF yield-4.19%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Profitability & financials

ROE-33.24%
Operating margin-423.87%
Net margin-389.37%
Debt ratio57.41%
Payout ratio

Return on equity (ROE) is -33.2%, below the sector average (1.0%). The operating margin is -423.9%. The debt ratio is 57.4%, so the financial structure is stable.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (separate)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$1.0M$1.6M$1.4M-15.05% ↓ slower
Operating profit-$3.5M-$5.0M-$5.8M
Net profit-$2.6M-$5.1M-$5.3M
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$1.0M$1.6M$1.4M
Operating profit-$3.5M-$5.0M-$5.8M
Net profit-$2.6M-$5.1M-$5.3M
Revenue CAGR2-yr avg 14.98%

Revenue fell 15.0% year over year (2023 ₩1.5 billion → 2024 ₩2.3 billion → 2025 ₩1.9 billion), and the three-year trend is 'mixed'. The rate of decline widened from the prior year. Operating results are in the red, so a swing back to profit matters more than the growth rate here. Over the 3 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 15.0%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 15.0%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 27.7% higher than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Source Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$430,304
Revenue YoY+27.72%
Operating profit-$1.7M
Op. profit YoY
Net profit-$1.7M
Net profit YoY

Technical indicators Computed

RSI (14)46.3
MA20₩12,832
MA60₩17,588
1-month-16.44%
3-month-56.52%
vs 52-wk high-66.70%

What stands out

Points to watch

  • The most recent full year was a loss, so it is worth checking whether profitability recovers.
  • Revenue fell 15.0% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).
  • The price is high versus peers, so expectations already appear priced in.

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
Q1 2026 cumulative revenue growth (YoY)+27.7%(2026.03)Confirmedlink
Radiopharmaceutical manufacturing facility investment amountapprox. ₩3.0 billion₩3.0 billionConfirmedlink
Scale of April 2026 financingapprox. ₩25.0 billion + ₩25.0 billionCB ₩25.0 billion, CPS 170+ 80Confirmedlink
P/B (price-to-book ratio)8.39xUnverified

Recent filings Source

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.