The Pinkfong Company earns its money from its own character IP such as Baby Shark, Pinkfong, and Bebefinn, with YouTube, app, and OTT content accounting for about two-thirds of 2025 revenue and the rest coming from licensing, MD (merchandise) goods, and games; it runs a one-source-multi-use model that extends a single character into video, goods, performances, and more, with an overwhelming share of revenue coming from overseas. In February 2026 it disclosed 2025 results (annual revenue ₩93.9 billion, operating profit ₩19.4 billion, net profit ₩18.2 billion), and in May and June it joined a licensing expo and announced numerous new Baby Shark collaborations in toys, household goods, and more, broadening its IP, though there is a lag before such collaborations are booked as revenue. The notable point is that if new IP and licensing collaborations translate into revenue and quarterly scale grows again, its global IP value and solid assets, including a P/B of 0.85x (forward 0.79x) below net asset value and a current ratio of 1,000%, come to the fore, while the fact that results hinge heavily on the popularity cycle of hit characters and whether the Q1 decline in core-business scale continues is the crux.

At-a-glance assessment financial health · growth · profitability · valuation

Financial healthStable
  • Debt ratio, current ratio and interest burden all look healthy.
GrowthDeclining
  • Revenue fell 3.6% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).
  • Most recent quarter (Q1 2026) revenue was 14.4% lower than a year earlier.
ProfitabilityHealthy
  • ROE is 9.9% (controlling-interest basis). It is above the sector average.
  • Operating margin is 20.6%.
ValuationUndervalued
  • The P/E sits below the sector median.

Ownership & governance As of 2025-12-31

Largest shareholder Kim Min-seok 15.87% (individual)

Controlling bloc incl. related parties 37.45%

With the controlling bloc holding 37%, the ownership structure is stable.

🔎 In-depth analysis

🏢Business
  • The Pinkfong Company earns its money from its own character IP such as Baby Shark, Pinkfong, Hogi (Wonderstar), and Bebefinn.
  • Its biggest revenue source is content such as video and music posted on YouTube, apps, and OTT, and as of 2025 content accounts for about two-thirds of total revenue.
  • The rest comes from licensing income earned by lending characters to outside brands, MD (goods) sales such as dolls and toys, and games.
  • A notable feature is that most of its revenue comes from overseas; in 2025, external-customer revenue was about ₩68.8 billion overseas and about ₩25.1 billion domestic, an overwhelming overseas weighting.
  • Because it runs a one-source-multi-use (OSMU, reusing the same IP across multiple businesses) model that extends a single character into video, goods, performances, food and beverage, and more, one popular character can heavily sway the company's overall results.
📈Price & chart
  • The latest close is ₩10,900, with a market cap of ₩156.4 billion.
  • The price sits below the 20-day line (₩11,077) and below the 60-day line (₩13,528).
  • Trading below both its short- and medium-term moving averages, the trend is on the soft side.
  • The RSI (a supplementary gauge that scores the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 44.9, a neutral level.
  • The one-month change is -4.6%, the three-month change is -29.6%, and the price stands -73.8% from its 52-week high.
  • Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 24 (on a 1-99 scale that weights recent returns against the index over the past year more heavily; higher means stronger than the market).
  • That places it in roughly the top 76% of all stocks by strength.
  • Over the past three months it lagged the index by 7.8%.
  • Chart reading is best done alongside trading volume and disclosure dates.
📊Key metrics
  • On an asset-value basis, this is an undervalued zone.
  • With a P/B (how many times net asset value per share the share price is) of 0.85x, the shares trade below net asset value, and the forward P/B reflecting this year's expected earnings is lower still at 0.85x.
  • In other words, you are buying below the net assets it holds.
  • Profitability supports it too.
  • ROE (how much is earned in a year on shareholders' equity) is 9.9%, the operating margin is 20.6%, and the net margin is 19.3%, thick margins for a content business.
  • The finances are solid.
  • With a current ratio above 1,000%, cash-like assets against near-term debt are very ample, and a debt ratio of 110.8% is a figure that includes accounting liabilities such as leases and reflects covering interest costs with operating profit.
  • Given its own IP, double-digit margins, and a share price below net asset value, a multiple at this level is hard to view as an excessive burden.
🚀Growth
  • Growth is passing through an inflection zone.
  • Three-year revenue moved ₩87.8 billion to ₩97.4 billion to ₩93.9 billion, dipping 3.6% last year to a flattish range, but net profit went from a ₩16.3 billion loss in 2023 to a ₩7.9 billion profit in 2024 and a ₩18.2 billion profit in 2025, establishing a profitable footing.
  • Operating profit also held a double-digit margin, from ₩18.8 billion in 2024 to ₩19.4 billion in 2025.
  • The key point is that the company has entered a stage of steadily generating profit after leaving a loss-making structure behind.
  • Future revenue depends on how quickly popular-IP new licensing and goods and offline collaborations get booked as actual revenue.
📰Recent news & filings
  • Recent disclosures center on regular reports and post-listing ownership filings.
  • A February 2026 disclosure of a change in revenue and profit structure showed 2025 results (annual revenue ₩93.9 billion, operating profit ₩19.4 billion, net profit ₩18.2 billion), and the March business report and May quarterly report disclosed detailed results.
  • At the time of its listing last November, a securities-issuance results report confirms it raised about ₩76.0 billion (2 million common shares).
  • Since listing, filings on executives' and major shareholders' holdings of specified securities and on large-holding status continued in May and June.
  • On the company's side, it has continued a strategy of broadening IP into goods and offline experiences by joining Licensing Expo 2026 in May and June and announcing numerous new Baby Shark collaborations (toys, household goods, sporting goods, and more).
  • However, because there is a lag before such collaborations are booked as revenue, the announcements themselves do not translate directly into results.
🧭Bottom line
  • This is a stock with clear strengths.
  • It holds its own IP with global recognition, earns most of its revenue overseas, and has stable finances with a current ratio of 1,000% and a double-digit operating margin.
  • Above all, it trades below net asset value (P/B 0.85x, forward 0.79x), so asset value underpins the share price.
  • In other words, even as a content company, it is fairly solid on the downside from an asset standpoint.
  • On the other hand, the points to examine are that results hinge heavily on the popularity cycle of hit characters, and whether the Q1 decline in core-business scale continues.
  • In short, if new IP and licensing collaborations connect to revenue and quarterly scale grows again, IP value and the low P/B come to the fore together and it strengthens; conversely, if the core-business revenue slowdown drags on, the pace of the earnings recovery becomes the crux.
  • The foundation of asset value and overseas IP is a factor that props up the stock's floor in any phase.

🔎 Valuation vs peers Inconclusive

Compared against character/IP-based content and toy companies whose OSMU model of extending their own characters into video, licensing, and goods is similar.

PeerP/EP/BROE
SAMG Entertainment8.73x3.24x37.14%
Aurora World9.30x1.15x12.40%

(a) Position versus peers: the P/E of 9.4x is similar to SAMG Entertainment (9.45) and Aurora (8.97), but ROE at 9.9% is lower than SAMG Entertainment (37.1%) and Aurora (12.4%), and the P/B (0.93) is the lowest. On an asset basis it is the cheapest, but capital efficiency falls short of peers. (b) Premium/discount: IP recognition, financial stability, and a high overseas share are premium factors, but revenue contraction and a slowdown in core-business profit are offsetting discount factors. (c) Limits of the trailing P/E: last year's net profit jumped sharply as it escaped a loss base, making the P/E look low, but this is a temporary effect right after an earnings inflection. On a forward basis reflecting this year's declining profit, the multiple steps up, so it is hard to accept the current 'cheap look' at face value. Until a signal of scale recovery is confirmed, it is appropriate to hold judgment.

₩10,900 +4.41%
Market cap $103.7M

Price history Close · MA20 · MA60

Close MA20MA60

The latest close is ₩10,900 and the market capitalization is ₩156.4 billion. The price sits below its 20-day moving average (₩11,077) and below its 60-day moving average (₩13,528). It is under both its short- and medium-term moving averages, so the trend looks subdued. The RSI (a supplementary indicator that gauges the strength of gains versus losses over the past 14 days on a 0-100 scale) is 44.9, a neutral level. The one-month change is -4.6%, the three-month change is -29.6%, and the position relative to the 52-week high is -73.8%. Relative strength versus the KOSDAQ is 24 (on a 1-99 scale, converted from returns against the index over the past year with more weight on recent performance; higher means stronger than the market). It is stronger than roughly 24% of all stocks. Over the past three months it lagged the index by 7.8%. Chart interpretation is best done alongside trading volume and the dates on which disclosures occur.

Relative performance stock vs index · start = 100

24Relative strength vs KOSDAQ1–99 · last 12 months’ return vs the index, recency-weighted · higher = stronger than the marketTop 76% strength

Excess return vs index · 3M -7.82% / 6M -47.40% / 12M -70.97%

StockKOSDAQ

Key metrics vs whole-market median

Valuation

P/E (trailing)8.62x
P/B0.85x
P/S1.69x
EPS₩1,265
BPS (book value/share)₩12,829
Dividend yield
DPS

The P/E of 8.62x is below the whole-market median (13.81x). The P/B of 0.85x is below the whole-market median (1.15x). Both metrics are low versus peers, so the price is not expensive relative to earnings and assets.

Enterprise value (EV)

Net debt-$96.1M
EV (enterprise value)$6.0M
EV/EBIT0.47x
EV/EBITDA0.36x
EV/Sales0.10x
FCF (free cash flow)$12.1M
FCF yield11.81%

EV = market cap + net debt. It reflects cash and debt, so it captures the real cost of the whole business that market cap alone misses; lower multiples are cheaper relative to earnings or sales.

Profitability & financials

ROE9.86%
Operating margin20.63%
Net margin19.34%
Debt ratio110.75%
Payout ratio

Return on equity (ROE) is 9.9%, above the whole-market average (5.0%). The operating margin is 20.6%. The debt ratio is 110.8%, so the financial structure is moderate.

Growth FY2025 · annual report (consolidated)

Item202320242025YoY
Revenue$58.2M$64.5M$62.2M-3.60% ↓ slower
Operating profit$2.6M$12.5M$12.8M+2.93% ↓ slower
Net profit-$10.8M$5.3M$12.0M+128.78%
5-year20212022202320242025
Revenue$58.2M$64.5M$62.2M
Operating profit$2.6M$12.5M$12.8M
Net profit-$10.8M$5.3M$12.0M
Revenue CAGR2-yr avg 3.37%

Revenue fell 3.6% year over year (2023 ₩87.8 billion → 2024 ₩97.4 billion → 2025 ₩93.9 billion), and the three-year trend is 'mixed'. The rate of decline widened from the prior year. Operating profit rose 2.9% year over year. The pace of that profit growth is gradually easing. Over the 3 years on record, revenue compound annual growth (CAGR) is 3.4%. The two-year revenue CAGR is 3.4%. In the most recent quarter (Q1 2026), revenue was 14.4% lower than the same period a year earlier.

Latest quarterly results Q1 2026 · vs year-ago

Revenue$13.7M
Revenue YoY-14.43%
Operating profit$1.9M
Op. profit YoY-51.86%
Net profit$4.1M
Net profit YoY+16.26%

Technical indicators

RSI (14)44.9
MA20₩11,077
MA60₩13,528
1-month-4.64%
3-month-29.63%
vs 52-wk high-73.77%

What stands out

  • P/E and P/B are both low versus peers, so the price looks inexpensive relative to earnings and assets.
  • The balance sheet is stable in terms of debt and liquidity.

Points to watch

  • Revenue fell 3.6% year over year (3-year trend: mixed).

Recent news & events searched · sourced

Figure cross-check computed ↔ external

MetricComputedExternalStatusSource
2025 net profit₩18.2 billionrevenue 939·operating profit 194·net profit 182Confirmedlink
Q1 2026 revenue₩20.6 billionUnverifiedlink
Business revenue mix and overseas sharerevenue , revenue2025 revenue approx. 688· approx. 251Confirmedlink

Recent filings

📖 Plain-language glossary — expand if you are new to this
P/E
How many times a year's net profit the price is worth (lower is cheaper relative to earnings). The P/E here is on trailing (last full-year) results; for companies whose earnings swing fast (memory chips and other cyclicals/high-growth), a forward P/E on this year's expected earnings is more accurate.
P/B
Price relative to net assets (equity). Around 1x means it trades near book value; below 1x means below book.
P/S
Price relative to a year's revenue — useful for growth companies with thin earnings.
Net debt / EV
Net debt = interest-bearing debt − cash. Negative means more cash than debt (net cash). EV (enterprise value) = market cap + net debt, closer to what it would cost to buy the whole business.
EV/EBIT · EV/EBITDA · EV/Sales
Enterprise value against operating profit (EBIT), EBITDA, or revenue. Unlike P/E these reflect debt and cash; lower is cheaper relative to earnings power or sales.
FCF / FCF yield
Free cash flow = operating cash − capex, the cash actually left over. FCF yield = FCF ÷ market cap; higher means more cash generated per unit of market value.
Intrinsic value (DCF)
Future free cash flow (or, for some capex-heavy but profitable names, forecast earnings) discounted to today to estimate per-share value. Because it shifts a lot with the discount-rate and growth assumptions, it is shown as a bear/base/bull range, and the basis and assumptions are disclosed in one line beneath it.
ROE
How much profit the company earns in a year on its equity (%). Higher means better returns on capital.
EPS / BPS
Earnings per share / net assets (book value) per share.
Operating / net margin
Profit left from the core business / final profit after tax and interest, per unit of revenue.
Debt ratio
Debt relative to equity (%). Higher means more reliance on borrowing (norms vary by sector).
Current ratio
Assets convertible to cash within a year against debt due within a year. Above 100% leaves some short-term headroom.
Interest coverage
How many times operating profit covers the interest owed. Below 1x means operating profit alone struggles to cover interest.
Dividend yield / payout ratio
The year's dividend as a % of today's price / the share of earnings paid out as dividends.
Revenue CAGR
Multi-year growth expressed as a single yearly average (compound annual growth rate).
RSI (short-term signal)
Whether recent price action is overheated or beaten down. Above 70 is overbought, below 30 oversold.
MA20 / MA60 (moving averages)
The 20- and 60-day average price. Price above them signals a firmer short-term trend.
vs 52-week high
How far below the past year's peak the price sits now (%).

All figures are for reference only; how they read varies by sector and over time.

Sources: Korea FSC market-price API (data.go.kr), OpenDART, KRX/KIND — public data only.

Bong Stocks presents public-data-based information for reference only. It is not investment advice and contains no target prices, ratings, or buy/sell recommendations. Verify independently before making any decision.